Ivarsson M, Svensson P
Department of Physiological Sciences, Section for Neuroscience, Lund University, S-223 62 Lund, Sweden.
J Neurophysiol. 2000 Feb;83(2):796-807. doi: 10.1152/jn.2000.83.2.796.
The aim of these experiments was to obtain a detailed knowledge of how the orbicularis oculi muscle is activated during the execution of a conditioned eyeblink response (CR). This is the first critical step to understand the underlying neural mechanisms involved in the control of the CR. Decerebrate ferrets were trained in a classical conditioning paradigm. The conditioned stimulus (CS) was a train of electrical stimuli (15 pulses, 50 Hz, 1 mA) applied to the forelimb, and the unconditioned stimulus (US) was a train of electrical stimuli (3 pulses, 50 Hz, 3-4 mA) to the periorbital region. The CRs were studied by recording electromyograms (EMGs) from the orbicularis oculi muscle. The eyeblink CR in all animals showed a similar topography with at least two different components, CR1 and CR2, which were expressed at different rates. CR1 appeared first during acquisition, had a shorter onset latency, and was more phasic and more resistant to extinction than CR2. A marked pause in the muscle activity separated the two components. To control that the two-component CR were not species, paradigm or preparation specific, awake rabbits were trained with a tone CS (300 ms, 4 kHz, 64 dB) and a train of periorbital stimuli as US (3 pulses, 50 Hz, 3 mA). CR1 and CR2 were present in the rabbit eyeblink CR. The cerebellum is implicated in the control of CRs and to study whether separate neural pathways were responsible for CR1 and CR2, direct brachium pontis stimulation was used to replace the forelimb CS. CR1 and CR2 were present in the CR elicited by the brachium pontis CS. The presence of CR1 and CR2 after a unilateral lesion of the brachium conjunctivum shows that output from the contralateral cerebellar hemisphere was not the cause for any of the components. Other mechanisms that might be involved in the separation of the CR into two components are discussed. The results show that the eyeblink CR consists of at least two components, CR1 and CR2, which most likely originate either as a direct central command from the cerebellum or in the output pathway before the facial nucleus.
这些实验的目的是详细了解在条件性眨眼反应(CR)执行过程中眼轮匝肌是如何被激活的。这是理解CR控制中潜在神经机制的关键第一步。对去大脑的雪貂进行经典条件反射范式训练。条件刺激(CS)是施加在前肢的一串电刺激(15个脉冲,50赫兹,1毫安),非条件刺激(US)是施加在眶周区域的一串电刺激(3个脉冲,50赫兹,3 - 4毫安)。通过记录眼轮匝肌的肌电图(EMG)来研究CR。所有动物的眨眼CR都呈现出相似的地形图,至少有两个不同的成分,CR1和CR2,它们以不同的速率表现出来。CR1在习得过程中首先出现,起始潜伏期较短,比CR2更具相位性且更不易消退。肌肉活动中的明显停顿将这两个成分分开。为了控制这两个成分的CR不是特定物种、范式或制备所特有的,对清醒的兔子进行训练,使用音调CS(300毫秒,4千赫兹,64分贝)和一串眶周刺激作为US(3个脉冲,50赫兹,3毫安)。兔子的眨眼CR中存在CR1和CR2。小脑与CR的控制有关,为了研究是否有单独的神经通路负责CR1和CR2,使用直接刺激脑桥臂来替代前肢CS。由脑桥臂CS引发的CR中存在CR1和CR2。在结合臂单侧损伤后CR1和CR2的存在表明,对侧小脑半球的输出不是任何一个成分的原因。还讨论了可能参与将CR分离为两个成分的其他机制。结果表明,眨眼CR至少由两个成分CR1和CR2组成,它们很可能要么起源于小脑的直接中枢指令,要么起源于面神经核之前的输出通路。