Zhong L, Goldberg M S, Parent M E, Hanley J A
Joint Departments of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Qe, Canada.
Lung Cancer. 2000 Jan;27(1):3-18. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5002(99)00093-8.
A meta-analysis was carried out to calculate a pooled estimate of relative risk of lung cancer following exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and to determine whether there was any heterogeneity in the pooled estimates according to selected characteristics of the studies. A total of 35 case-control and five cohort studies providing quantitative estimates of the association between lung cancer and exposure to ETS published between January 1981 and March 1999 were identified. Using fixed- and random-effects models, we calculated pooled estimates of relative risk for exposure to ETS from subjects' parents (during childhood), spouses, and coworkers. As well, we investigated whether the pooled estimates of relative risk varied by study location, degree of control of potential confounding variables, proportion of cases confirmed histologically, proportion of surrogate respondents, nonresponse rates, and year of publication. The relative risk of lung cancer among non smoking women ever exposed to ETS from their husbands' smoking was 1.20 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.12-1.29). The pooled relative risk was 1.19 (95% CI: 1.10-1.29) for case-control studies and 1.29 (95% CI: 1.04-1.62) for cohort studies. In various subgroup and meta-regression analyses, we found no statistically significant differences by selected characteristics of the studies. In addition, we found that the risk of lung cancer increased consistently with increasing levels of exposure. The 11 studies reporting relative risks among male non smokers yielded a pooled relative risk of 1.48 (95% CI: 1.13-1.92) for ever exposed to ETS, and the relative risk of lung cancer for ever being exposed to ETS at work was a 1.16 (95% CI: 1.05-1.28). These results are consistent with the hypothesis that exposure to ETS increases the risk of lung cancer. While there may be alternative explanations to the data, it is more likely that the observed association is not an artifact and that ETS causes lung cancer in non smokers.
进行了一项荟萃分析,以计算接触环境烟草烟雾(ETS)后患肺癌的相对风险的合并估计值,并根据研究的选定特征确定合并估计值中是否存在任何异质性。共识别出35项病例对照研究和5项队列研究,这些研究提供了1981年1月至1999年3月期间发表的肺癌与接触ETS之间关联的定量估计。使用固定效应模型和随机效应模型,我们计算了受试者的父母(童年时期)、配偶和同事接触ETS的相对风险的合并估计值。此外,我们调查了相对风险的合并估计值是否因研究地点、潜在混杂变量的控制程度、组织学确诊病例的比例、替代受访者的比例、无应答率和发表年份而有所不同。曾接触丈夫吸烟产生的ETS的非吸烟女性患肺癌的相对风险为1.20(95%置信区间(CI):1.12 - 1.29)。病例对照研究的合并相对风险为1.19(95%CI:1.10 - 1.29),队列研究的合并相对风险为1.29(95%CI:1.04 - 1.62)。在各种亚组和荟萃回归分析中,我们发现根据研究的选定特征没有统计学上的显著差异。此外,我们发现肺癌风险随着接触水平的增加而持续增加。报告男性非吸烟者相对风险的11项研究得出,曾接触ETS的合并相对风险为1.48(95%CI:1.13 - 1.92),工作中曾接触ETS的肺癌相对风险为1.16(95%CI:1.05 - 1.28)。这些结果与接触ETS会增加肺癌风险的假设一致。虽然对这些数据可能有其他解释,但更有可能的是,观察到的关联不是人为造成的,并且ETS会导致非吸烟者患肺癌。