Suppr超能文献

在高架十字迷宫中测试的大鼠中,吉哌隆和氟西汀的急性和慢性效应:一项行为学分析。

Acute and chronic effects of gepirone and fluoxetine in rats tested in the elevated plus-maze: an ethological analysis.

作者信息

Silva R C, Brandão M L

机构信息

Dept. de Psicologia, FFCLRP-USP, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2000 Feb;65(2):209-16. doi: 10.1016/s0091-3057(99)00193-8.

Abstract

The potential role of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) in anxiety has been the subject of much research, most of it addressed to the hypothesis that 5-HT promotes anxiety and, therefore, that drugs that reduce 5-HT functions will be effective anxiolytic agents in human anxiety disorders. However, the effects of serotoninergic drugs in different behavioral paradigms have been inconsistent. These inconsistencies have been particularly well illustrated in the elevated plus-maze. In the present study we provided an ethopharmacological analysis (in addition to conventional measures) of the behavior of rats in the elevated plus-maze with transparent walls after acute and chronic treatments with gepirone, an agonist of 5-HT1A receptors, and fluoxetine, a selective inhibitor of serotonin reuptake. Although gepirone has been used to treat anxiety, fluoxetine is a mainstay in the treatment of depression. Acute treatment with gepirone (1, 3, 5.6, and 10 mg/kg, IP) produced an anxiogenic profile with increased risk assessment behaviors (e.g., flat-back approach) and decreased behavioral measures that are inversely related to "anxiety" (e.g., head dipping and end-arm activity). In contrast, chronic gepirone (10 mg/kg day, PO) produced an opposite effect showing an anxiolytic profile that is consistent with the clinical use of this drug, which shows efficacy after 2-4 weeks of treatment. Acute fluoxetine (5.6 and 10 mg/kg, IP) also produced an anxiogenic profile with reduced head dipping and end-arm activity. On the other hand, chronic fluoxetine (10 mg/kg day, PO) had no effect on any of the behavioral measures. These data demonstrate: (a) the anxiogenic and anxiolytic effects of acute and chronic gepirone, respectively, corroborate with the observed effects of these treatments in the clinic; (b) similarly, the anxiogenic effects of acute fluoxetine observed here have also been reported in clinical studies with 5-HT reuptake blockers. This class of compounds has not been systematically used as anxiolytic; (c) the elevated plus-maze with transparent walls shows good sensitivity for evaluating serotonergic drugs with anxiogenic and anxiolytic profile.

摘要

5-羟色胺(5-HT)在焦虑症中的潜在作用一直是众多研究的主题,其中大部分研究针对的是5-HT促进焦虑这一假说,因此,降低5-HT功能的药物将成为治疗人类焦虑症的有效抗焦虑剂。然而,血清素能药物在不同行为范式中的作用并不一致。这些不一致性在高架十字迷宫实验中表现得尤为明显。在本研究中,我们(除了常规测量外)对大鼠在透明壁高架十字迷宫中的行为进行了行为药理学分析,这些大鼠分别接受了5-HT1A受体激动剂吉哌隆和5-羟色胺再摄取选择性抑制剂氟西汀的急性和慢性治疗。虽然吉哌隆已被用于治疗焦虑症,但氟西汀是治疗抑郁症的主要药物。吉哌隆急性给药(腹腔注射,剂量为1、3、5.6和10mg/kg)产生了致焦虑效应,表现为风险评估行为增加(如平背接近),以及与“焦虑症”呈负相关的行为指标减少(如头部下垂和端臂活动)。相比之下,吉哌隆慢性给药(口服,剂量为10mg/kg/天)产生了相反的效果,表现出抗焦虑效应,这与该药物的临床应用一致,该药物在治疗2-4周后显示出疗效。氟西汀急性给药(腹腔注射,剂量为5.6和10mg/kg)也产生了致焦虑效应,表现为头部下垂和端臂活动减少。另一方面,氟西汀慢性给药(口服,剂量为10mg/kg/天)对任何行为指标均无影响。这些数据表明:(a)急性和慢性吉哌隆分别产生的致焦虑和抗焦虑效应,与这些治疗方法在临床上观察到的效果一致;(b)同样,此处观察到的氟西汀急性给药致焦虑效应,在5-羟色胺再摄取阻滞剂的临床研究中也有报道。这类化合物尚未被系统地用作抗焦虑剂;(c)带有透明壁的高架十字迷宫对评估具有致焦虑和抗焦虑作用的血清素能药物具有良好的敏感性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验