• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

品牌名抗癫痫药物的通用名替代:一项调查

Generic substitution for brand name antiepileptic drugs: a survey.

作者信息

Guberman A, Corman C

机构信息

Division of Neurology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa Hospital, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Neurol Sci. 2000 Feb;27(1):37-43. doi: 10.1017/s0317167100051957.

DOI:10.1017/s0317167100051957
PMID:10676586
Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: There are presently 26 different generic preparations for five brand name antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) on the Canadian market with others likely to be released in the near future. The purpose of this review is to examine the basis for the controversy surrounding generic substitution for brand name antiepileptic drugs, to present the results of a survey of neurologists' and patients' attitudes toward generic substitution and to increase neurologists' awareness of the issues.

METHODS

The current federal and provincial regulations pertaining to generic drug approval and substitution are reviewed. Published anecdotal and survey reports of the effectiveness and tolerability of generic substitution for AEDs are reviewed. A pilot questionnaire survey of 83 patients from four adult epilepsy clinics and 46 neurologists from across Canada was undertaken to determine attitudes toward generic substitution.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Several authors have suggested that some AEDs, particularly those with a narrow therapeutic index, may pose problems with generic substitution. Although generic AEDs are lower in price, possible increased side effects and morbidity and the need for closer monitoring could partially offset the cost savings. The results of our survey highlight significant unawareness of the process of generic substitution among both patients and neurologists and reveal a general level of discomfort among neurologists to prescribe generic AEDs. Further data should be obtained about the potential consequences of generic substitution in epilepsy patients.

摘要

背景/目的:目前加拿大市场上有5种品牌抗癫痫药物(AEDs)的26种不同通用制剂,近期可能还会有其他产品上市。本综述的目的是探讨围绕品牌抗癫痫药物通用名替换争议的依据,呈现一项关于神经科医生和患者对通用名替换态度的调查结果,并提高神经科医生对这些问题的认识。

方法

回顾当前联邦和省级有关通用药物批准和替换的法规。查阅已发表的关于AEDs通用名替换有效性和耐受性的轶事及调查报告。对来自四个成人癫痫诊所的83名患者和加拿大各地的46名神经科医生进行了一项初步问卷调查,以确定他们对通用名替换的态度。

结果与结论

几位作者指出,一些AEDs,尤其是治疗指数较窄的药物,可能在通用名替换方面存在问题。尽管通用名AEDs价格较低,但副作用和发病率可能增加以及需要更密切监测,可能会部分抵消成本节约。我们的调查结果凸显了患者和神经科医生对通用名替换过程的显著无知,并揭示了神经科医生在开具通用名AEDs时普遍存在的不适感。应获取更多关于癫痫患者通用名替换潜在后果的数据。

相似文献

1
Generic substitution for brand name antiepileptic drugs: a survey.品牌名抗癫痫药物的通用名替代:一项调查
Can J Neurol Sci. 2000 Feb;27(1):37-43. doi: 10.1017/s0317167100051957.
2
Therapeutic equivalency of generic antiepileptic drugs: results of a survey.通用抗癫痫药物的治疗等效性:一项调查结果
Epilepsy Behav. 2004 Dec;5(6):995-8. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2004.05.011.
3
Patient and physician reactions to generic antiepileptic substitution in the treatment of epilepsy.患者和医生对通用抗癫痫药物替代治疗癫痫的反应。
Epilepsy Behav. 2005 Aug;7(1):98-105. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2005.04.005.
4
[Use of generic anti-epilepsy drugs in France: survey of neurologists and review of the literature].[法国通用抗癫痫药物的使用:神经科医生调查及文献综述]
Rev Neurol (Paris). 2007 Apr;163(4):455-61. doi: 10.1016/s0035-3787(07)90421-x.
5
Are there potential problems with generic substitution of antiepileptic drugs? A review of issues.抗癫痫药物的通用名替换存在潜在问题吗?相关问题综述。
Seizure. 2006 Apr;15(3):165-76. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2005.12.010. Epub 2006 Feb 28.
6
The economic implications of generic substitution of antiepileptic drugs: a review of recent evidence.抗癫痫药物通用名替换的经济影响:近期证据综述
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2009 Oct;10(14):2317-28. doi: 10.1517/14656560903140525.
7
Generic antiepileptic drugs-Safe or harmful in patients with epilepsy?通用抗癫痫药物——对癫痫患者安全还是有害?
Epilepsia. 2018 Jul;59(7):1273-1281. doi: 10.1111/epi.14439. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
8
Generic substitution in the treatment of epilepsy: patient and physician perceptions.癫痫治疗中的通用名药物替代:患者与医生的看法
Epilepsy Behav. 2008 Nov;13(4):693-9. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2008.06.001. Epub 2008 Sep 10.
9
Prescribing generic antiepileptic drugs: Issues and concerns for nurse practitioners.开具通用抗癫痫药物:执业护士面临的问题与担忧。
J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2010 Jun;22(6):300-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2010.00511.x.
10
Generic lamotrigine versus brand-name Lamictal bioequivalence in patients with epilepsy: A field test of the FDA bioequivalence standard.通用拉莫三嗪与品牌名 Lamictal 在癫痫患者中的生物等效性:FDA 生物等效性标准的现场测试。
Epilepsia. 2015 Sep;56(9):1415-24. doi: 10.1111/epi.13095. Epub 2015 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Generic orphan drug substitution: a critical analysis of global practices and Saudi Arabia's perspective.通用型孤儿药替代:对全球实践及沙特阿拉伯观点的批判性分析
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Apr 18;15:1376009. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1376009. eCollection 2024.
2
Therapeutic Basis of Generic Substitution of Antiseizure Medications.抗癫痫药物通用名替换的治疗基础。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2022 May;381(2):188-196. doi: 10.1124/jpet.121.000994. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
3
Effects of generic exchange of solid oral dosage forms in neurological disorders: a systematic review.
固体口服剂型仿制药替换在神经紊乱中的作用:系统评价。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2020 Apr;42(2):393-417. doi: 10.1007/s11096-020-01023-2. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
4
Nocebo in Biosimilars and Generics in Neurology: A Systematic Review.生物类似药和仿制药中的反安慰剂效应在神经病学中的系统评价
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Jul 24;10:809. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00809. eCollection 2019.
5
Comparison of brand versus generic antiepileptic drug adverse event reporting rates in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)中品牌与非专利抗癫痫药物不良事件报告率的比较。
Epilepsy Res. 2017 Sep;135:71-78. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2017.06.007. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
6
Potential problems and recommendations regarding substitution of generic antiepileptic drugs: a systematic review of literature.关于通用型抗癫痫药物替代的潜在问题与建议:文献系统综述
Springerplus. 2016 Feb 25;5:182. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-1824-2. eCollection 2016.
7
Three-way, three-period, crossover bioequivalence study of single oral dose of three brands of 300 mg phenytoin sodium tablets marketed in India, on healthy Indian human volunteers.在健康的印度人类志愿者身上进行的一项三交叉生物等效性研究,该研究针对在印度市场销售的三种品牌的300毫克苯妥英钠片剂,采用三因素三周期交叉设计,给予单剂量口服给药。
J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2013 Oct;4(4):243-6. doi: 10.4103/0976-500X.119709.
8
Requirements for generic antiepileptic medicines: a clinical perspective.通用抗癫痫药物的需求:临床视角。
J Neurol. 2011 Dec;258(12):2128-32. doi: 10.1007/s00415-011-6126-6. Epub 2011 Jun 11.
9
Comparison of dissolution profiles and serum concentrations of two lamotrigine tablet formulations.两种拉莫三嗪片剂制剂的溶出曲线和血清浓度比较。
Drugs R D. 2011;11(1):53-60. doi: 10.2165/11588260-000000000-00000.
10
Substitution of anticonvulsant drugs.抗惊厥药物的替换。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2009 Jun;5(3):449-57. doi: 10.2147/tcrm.s5366. Epub 2009 Jun 22.