抗癫痫药物的通用名替换存在潜在问题吗?相关问题综述。

Are there potential problems with generic substitution of antiepileptic drugs? A review of issues.

作者信息

Crawford P, Feely M, Guberman A, Kramer G

机构信息

York Hospital, Wigginton Road, York YO31 8HE, UK.

出版信息

Seizure. 2006 Apr;15(3):165-76. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2005.12.010. Epub 2006 Feb 28.

Abstract

In response to increasing cost pressures, healthcare systems are encouraging the use of generic medicines. This review explores potential problems with generic substitution of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). A broad search strategy identified approximately 70 relevant articles. Potential problems with generic substitution included: The limited evidence (mainly case reports with some pharmacokinetic studies) appears to support these concerns for older AEDs. As a result, restrictions on use of specific generic AEDs are in place in some countries and recommended by some lay epilepsy organisations. As more AEDs lose patent protection, it is important to examine the question of whether generic substitution may pose problems for patients with epilepsy, and whether there should be safeguards to ensure that both physician and patient are informed when generic substitution occurs.

摘要

为应对不断增加的成本压力,医疗保健系统鼓励使用通用药物。本综述探讨了抗癫痫药物(AEDs)通用名替换的潜在问题。广泛的检索策略确定了约70篇相关文章。通用名替换的潜在问题包括:有限的证据(主要是病例报告和一些药代动力学研究)似乎支持了对老一代AEDs的这些担忧。因此,一些国家对特定通用名AEDs的使用有所限制,一些非专业癫痫组织也提出了相关建议。随着越来越多的AEDs失去专利保护,审视通用名替换是否会给癫痫患者带来问题,以及是否应采取保障措施以确保在发生通用名替换时医生和患者都能得到通知,这一点很重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索