Bonano E J, Apostolakis G E, Salter P F, Ghassemi A, Jennings S
Beta Corporation International, 6719-D Academy Road NE, Albuquerque, NM 87109, USA.
J Hazard Mater. 2000 Jan 7;71(1-3):35-57. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3894(99)00071-0.
A single framework integrating risk assessment and decision analysis methods for evaluating, ranking and selecting preferred remediation alternatives at a contaminated site was developed and demonstrated. The methodology used relies on stakeholder inputs throughout the entire process and employs those inputs to combine the results of multiple risk assessments to arrive at a total impact for each remediation alternative. The total impact values allow the ranking of the alternatives, which in turn, serves as the basis for deliberations among the stakeholders in order to identify the preferred alternative. Six major risk or impact categories were considered in the evaluation of the alternatives: human health and safety, environmental protection, life cycle cost, socio-economics, cultural, archeological and historical resources, and programmatic assumptions.
开发并展示了一个单一框架，该框架整合了风险评估和决策分析方法，用于在污染场地评估、排序和选择首选修复方案。所使用的方法在整个过程中依赖利益相关者的投入，并利用这些投入来综合多个风险评估的结果，以得出每个修复方案的总体影响。总体影响值可对方案进行排序，进而为利益相关者之间的审议提供基础，以便确定首选方案。在评估方案时考虑了六个主要风险或影响类别：人类健康与安全、环境保护、生命周期成本、社会经济、文化、考古和历史资源以及方案假设。
