Briggs David J
Department of Environmental Epidemiology and Public Health, Imperial College London, Norfolk Place, London, W2 1PG, UK.
Environ Health. 2008 Nov 27;7:61. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-7-61.
Traditional methods of risk assessment have provided good service in support of policy, mainly in relation to standard setting and regulation of hazardous chemicals or practices. In recent years, however, it has become apparent that many of the risks facing society are systemic in nature - complex risks, set within wider social, economic and environmental contexts. Reflecting this, policy-making too has become more wide-ranging in scope, more collaborative and more precautionary in approach. In order to inform such policies, more integrated methods of assessment are needed. Based on work undertaken in two large EU-funded projects (INTARESE and HEIMTSA), this paper reviews the range of approaches to assessment now in used, proposes a framework for integrated environmental health impact assessment (both as a basis for bringing together and choosing between different methods of assessment, and extending these to more complex problems), and discusses some of the challenges involved in conducting integrated assessments to support policy. Integrated environmental health impact assessment is defined as a means of assessing health-related problems deriving from the environment, and health-related impacts of policies and other interventions that affect the environment, in ways that take account of the complexities, interdependencies and uncertainties of the real world. As such, it depends heavily on how issues are selected and framed, and implies the involvement of stakeholders both in issue-framing and design of the assessment, and to help interpret and evaluate the results. It is also a comparative process, which involves evaluating and comparing different scenarios. It consequently requires the ability to model the way in which the influences of exogenous factors, such as policies or other interventions, feed through the environment to affect health. Major challenges thus arise. Chief amongst these are the difficulties in ensuring effective stakeholder participation, in dealing with the multicausal and non-linear nature of many of the relationships between environment and health, and in taking account of adaptive and behavioural changes that characterise the systems concerned.
传统的风险评估方法在支持政策制定方面发挥了很好的作用,主要涉及危险化学品或行为的标准制定和监管。然而,近年来,很明显社会面临的许多风险本质上是系统性的——复杂风险,存在于更广泛的社会、经济和环境背景之中。反映在政策制定上,其范围也变得更广,更具协作性,且在方法上更具预防性。为了为这类政策提供信息,需要更综合的评估方法。基于在两个由欧盟资助的大型项目(INTARESE和HEIMTSA)中开展的工作,本文回顾了目前使用的一系列评估方法,提出了一个综合环境健康影响评估框架(作为整合不同评估方法并在它们之间进行选择以及将这些方法扩展到更复杂问题的基础),并讨论了进行综合评估以支持政策所涉及的一些挑战。综合环境健康影响评估被定义为一种评估源于环境的与健康相关问题以及影响环境的政策和其他干预措施的与健康相关影响的手段,其方式要考虑到现实世界的复杂性、相互依存性和不确定性。因此,它在很大程度上取决于问题的选择和构建方式,意味着利益相关者要参与问题构建和评估设计,并帮助解释和评估结果。它也是一个比较过程,涉及评估和比较不同的情景。因此,它需要有能力对外部因素(如政策或其他干预措施)的影响如何通过环境传导以影响健康的方式进行建模。由此产生了重大挑战。其中最主要的是难以确保利益相关者的有效参与,难以应对环境与健康之间许多关系的多因果和非线性性质,以及难以考虑到相关系统所特有的适应性和行为变化。