Whatmore A M, Efstratiou A, Pickerill A P, Broughton K, Woodard G, Sturgeon D, George R, Dowson C G
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.
Infect Immun. 2000 Mar;68(3):1374-82. doi: 10.1128/IAI.68.3.1374-1382.2000.
The oral streptococcal group (mitis phylogenetic group) currently consists of nine recognized species, although the group has been traditionally difficult to classify, with frequent changes in nomenclature over the years. The pneumococcus (Streptococcus pneumoniae), an important human pathogen, is traditionally distinguished from the most closely related oral streptococcal species Streptococcus mitis and Streptococcus oralis on the basis of three differentiating characteristics: optochin susceptibility, bile solubility, and agglutination with antipneumococcal polysaccharide capsule antibodies. However, there are many reports in the literature of pneumococci lacking one or more of these defining characteristics. Sometimes called "atypical" pneumococci, these isolates can be the source of considerable confusion in the clinical laboratory. Little is known to date about the genetic relationships of such organisms with classical S. pneumoniae isolates. Here we describe these relationships based on sequence analysis of housekeeping genes in comparison with previously characterized isolates of S. pneumoniae, S. mitis, and S. oralis. While most pneumococci were found to represent a closely related group these studies identified a subgroup of atypical pneumococcal isolates (bile insoluble and/or "acapsular") distinct from, though most closely related to, the "typical" pneumococcal isolates. However, a large proportion of isolates, found to be atypical on the basis of capsule reaction alone, did group with typical pneumococci, suggesting that they have either lost capsule production or represent as-yet-unrecognized capsular types. In contrast to typical S. pneumoniae, isolates phenotypically identified as S. mitis and S. oralis, which included isolates previously characterized in taxonomic studies, were genetically diverse. While most of the S. oralis isolates did fall into a well-separated group, S. mitis isolates did not cluster into a well-separated group. During the course of these studies we also identified a number of potentially important pathogenic isolates, which were frequently associated with respiratory disease, that phenotypically and genetically are most closely related to S. mitis but which harbor genes encoding the virulence determinants pneumolysin and autolysin classically associated with S. pneumoniae.
口腔链球菌群(缓症链球菌系统发育群)目前由9个公认的菌种组成,尽管多年来该菌群一直难以分类,命名也频繁变化。肺炎链球菌是一种重要的人类病原体,传统上它与关系最为密切的口腔链球菌种——缓症链球菌和口腔链球菌,是根据三个鉴别特征区分开来的:对奥普托欣敏感、胆汁溶解以及与抗肺炎球菌多糖荚膜抗体发生凝集反应。然而,文献中有许多关于肺炎链球菌缺乏这些界定特征中一项或多项的报道。这些分离株有时被称为“非典型”肺炎链球菌,它们可能会在临床实验室造成相当大的混淆。迄今为止,对于这类生物体与经典肺炎链球菌分离株之间的遗传关系知之甚少。在此,我们通过看家基因的序列分析,与先前已鉴定特征的肺炎链球菌、缓症链球菌和口腔链球菌分离株进行比较,来描述这些关系。虽然大多数肺炎链球菌被发现属于一个密切相关的菌群,但这些研究确定了一组非典型肺炎链球菌分离株(胆汁不溶性和/或“无荚膜”),它们与“典型”肺炎链球菌分离株不同,但关系最为密切。然而,很大一部分仅根据荚膜反应被判定为非典型的分离株,却与典型肺炎链球菌归为一组,这表明它们要么已经失去了荚膜产生能力,要么代表尚未被识别的荚膜类型。与典型的肺炎链球菌不同,表型鉴定为缓症链球菌和口腔链球菌的分离株(包括先前在分类学研究中已鉴定特征的分离株)在遗传上是多样的。虽然大多数口腔链球菌分离株确实属于一个界限分明的菌群,但缓症链球菌分离株并未聚集成一个界限分明的菌群。在这些研究过程中,我们还鉴定出一些潜在的重要致病分离株,它们经常与呼吸道疾病相关,在表型和遗传上与缓症链球菌关系最为密切,但却携带编码通常与肺炎链球菌相关的毒力决定因子——肺炎溶血素和自溶素的基因。