Torre D, Tambini R
Department of Infectious Diseases, Regional Hospital, Varese, Italy.
Scand J Infect Dis. 1999;31(6):543-7. doi: 10.1080/00365549950164409.
A meta-analysis of 5 randomized controlled trials (RCT), involving 339 patients with acute infectious mononucleosis (IM) treated with acyclovir (ACV) was performed. ACV was given intravenously in 2 RCTs, which included patients with more severe disease, and orally in the remaining 3 RCTs, which included patients with mild to moderate IM. Both clinical and virological endpoint data available from RCT were evaluated in this study. There was a trend towards clinical effectiveness of ACV treatment, but no statistically significant results were achieved. In contrast, a significant reduction in the rate of oropharyngeal EBV shedding was observed at the end of the therapy (overall OR: 6.62; 95% CI: 3.56-12.29; p < 0.00001). However, no difference in EBV shedding was observed 3 weeks later. There was no significant difference on adverse events in the groups of patients treated with ACV or placebo. In conclusion, clinical data do not support use of ACV for the treatment of acute IM, despite good virological activity of this drug. There is a need for more effective treatment of EBV infection.
对5项随机对照试验(RCT)进行了荟萃分析,这些试验涉及339例接受阿昔洛韦(ACV)治疗的急性传染性单核细胞增多症(IM)患者。在2项RCT中阿昔洛韦采用静脉给药,这些试验纳入了病情较重的患者;在其余3项RCT中采用口服给药,这些试验纳入了轻至中度IM患者。本研究评估了RCT中可得的临床和病毒学终点数据。阿昔洛韦治疗有临床有效性的趋势,但未取得统计学上的显著结果。相比之下,在治疗结束时观察到口咽EB病毒脱落率显著降低(总体比值比:6.62;95%置信区间:3.56 - 12.29;p < 0.00001)。然而,3周后未观察到EB病毒脱落在差异。接受阿昔洛韦或安慰剂治疗的患者组在不良事件方面无显著差异。总之,尽管该药物具有良好的病毒学活性,但临床数据不支持使用阿昔洛韦治疗急性IM。需要更有效的EB病毒感染治疗方法。