• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术前栓塞后行根治性肾切除术与单纯根治性肾切除术治疗肾细胞癌的比较。

Comparison of preoperative embolization followed by radical nephrectomy with radical nephrectomy alone for renal cell carcinoma.

作者信息

Zielinski H, Szmigielski S, Petrovich Z

机构信息

Department of Clinical Urology, MMA Central Clinical Hospital, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Am J Clin Oncol. 2000 Feb;23(1):6-12. doi: 10.1097/00000421-200002000-00002.

DOI:10.1097/00000421-200002000-00002
PMID:10683065
Abstract

A series of 474 patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC), who had radical nephrectomy during a period of 15 years, was studied to assess the prognostic significance of various pathologic parameters (tumor stage [pT], lymph node status, metastasis, tumor grade, venous involvement) and value of preoperative embolization of renal artery. There were: 20 (4%) pT1, 204 (43%) pT2, 245 (52%) pT3, and 5 (1%) pT4 patients. All 474 patients underwent nephrectomy including a group of 118 (25%) patients (24 pT2, 90 pT3, and 4 pT4) who underwent preoperative embolization of the renal artery. To compare treatment outcomes in embolized patients with RCC, a group of 116 (24%) nonembolized patients with RCC was selected. This group was matched for sex, age, stage, tumor size, and tumor grade, with the embolized patients (p<0.01). All important prognostic factors were studied as to their influence on survival by the treatment group. The overall 5- and 10-year survival was 62% and 47%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year survival rates were significantly better (p<0.01) for patients with pT2 than for those with pT3 tumors (79% vs. 50% and 59% vs. 35%, respectively). Involvement of regional lymph nodes (N+) was an important prognostic factor for survival in patients with pT3 tumors. The 5-year survival for pT3 N+ was 39%, compared with 66% in those with pT3N0 (p<0.01). Preoperative embolization was also an important factor influencing survival. The overall 5- and 10-year survival for 118 patients embolized before nephrectomy was 62% and 47%, respectively, and it was 35% and 23%, respectively, for the matched group of 116 patients treated with surgery alone (p = 0.01). The most important finding of this study was an apparent importance of preoperative embolization in improving patients' survival. This finding needs to be interpreted with caution and confirmed in a prospective randomized trial.

摘要

对474例在15年期间接受根治性肾切除术的肾细胞癌(RCC)患者进行了研究,以评估各种病理参数(肿瘤分期[pT]、淋巴结状态、转移、肿瘤分级、静脉受累情况)的预后意义以及术前肾动脉栓塞的价值。其中有:20例(4%)pT1期、204例(43%)pT2期、245例(52%)pT3期和5例(1%)pT4期患者。所有474例患者均接受了肾切除术,其中118例(25%)患者(24例pT2期、90例pT3期和4例pT4期)接受了术前肾动脉栓塞。为了比较接受栓塞治疗的RCC患者的治疗结果,选择了116例(24%)未接受栓塞治疗的RCC患者。该组在性别、年龄、分期、肿瘤大小和肿瘤分级方面与接受栓塞治疗的患者相匹配(p<0.01)。研究了所有重要预后因素对治疗组生存的影响。总体5年和10年生存率分别为62%和47%。pT2期患者的5年和10年生存率明显高于pT3期肿瘤患者(分别为79%对50%和59%对35%,p<0.01)。区域淋巴结受累(N+)是pT3期肿瘤患者生存的重要预后因素。pT3 N+患者的5年生存率为39%,而pT3N0患者为66%(p<0.01)。术前栓塞也是影响生存的重要因素。118例肾切除术前接受栓塞治疗的患者总体5年和10年生存率分别为62%和47%,而仅接受手术治疗的116例匹配患者组分别为35%和23%(p = 0.01)。本研究最重要的发现是术前栓塞在改善患者生存方面具有明显重要性。这一发现需要谨慎解读,并在前瞻性随机试验中得到证实。

相似文献

1
Comparison of preoperative embolization followed by radical nephrectomy with radical nephrectomy alone for renal cell carcinoma.术前栓塞后行根治性肾切除术与单纯根治性肾切除术治疗肾细胞癌的比较。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2000 Feb;23(1):6-12. doi: 10.1097/00000421-200002000-00002.
2
[Long-term survival analysis of 1 367 patients treated with radical nephrectomy from a single center].[单中心1367例行根治性肾切除术患者的长期生存分析]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2023 Nov 23;45(11):981-987. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20220614-00420.
3
Does radical nephrectomy with immunochemotherapy have any superiority over embolization alone in metastatic renal cell carcinoma? A preliminary report.在转移性肾细胞癌中,根治性肾切除术联合免疫化疗相对于单纯栓塞术是否具有优势?一项初步报告。
Urol Int. 2004;73(1):54-8. doi: 10.1159/000078805.
4
[Preoperative and palliative embolization of renal cell carcinomas: follow-up of 49 patients].[肾细胞癌的术前及姑息性栓塞:49例患者的随访]
Rofo. 2006 Apr;178(4):391-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-926538.
5
[Results of radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Report 1. Analysis according to the TNM staging system of the general rule for clinical and pathological studies on renal cell carcinoma].[肾细胞癌根治性肾切除术的结果。报告1。根据肾细胞癌临床和病理研究总则的TNM分期系统进行分析]
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1987 Mar;33(3):337-43.
6
[Recent management of renal cell carcinoma].[肾细胞癌的近期治疗]
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1988 Feb;15(2):219-23.
7
Lack of retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy predicts survival of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.无腹膜后淋巴结肿大可预测转移性肾细胞癌患者的生存情况。
J Urol. 2001 Jul;166(1):68-72.
8
Pre-operative renal arterial embolisation does not provide survival benefit in patients with radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma.对于接受根治性肾切除术治疗肾细胞癌的患者,术前肾动脉栓塞术并不能带来生存获益。
Br J Radiol. 2009 Aug;82(981):724-31. doi: 10.1259/bjr/17514226. Epub 2009 Mar 2.
9
[Results of endovascular interventions (embolization and chemoembolization) in the treatment of operable and extensive kidney cancer].[血管内介入治疗(栓塞和化疗栓塞)可手术及广泛性肾癌的结果]
Vopr Onkol. 1998;44(6):711-4.
10
Concomitant intraoperative renal artery embolization and resection of complex renal carcinoma.
J Vasc Surg. 2003 Sep;38(3):446-50. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(03)00429-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Robotic surgical techniques and methods for treating renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava tumor thrombus.治疗伴有下腔静脉瘤栓的肾细胞癌的机器人手术技术与方法
Curr Urol. 2025 May;19(3):177-186. doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000265. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
2
Results of Radical Nephrectomy and Inferior Vena Cava Thrombectomy.根治性肾切除术和下腔静脉血栓切除术的结果。
Curr Urol Rep. 2024 Dec;25(12):339-342. doi: 10.1007/s11934-024-01228-2. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
3
A Narrative Review on Robotic Surgery as Treatment for Renal Cell Carcinoma with Inferior Vena Cava Thrombus.
机器人手术治疗伴下腔静脉血栓的肾细胞癌的叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 26;13(5):1308. doi: 10.3390/jcm13051308.
4
The surgical evolution of radical nephrectomy and tumor thrombectomy: a narrative review.根治性肾切除术和肿瘤血栓切除术的外科手术进展:一篇综述
Ann Transl Med. 2023 Mar 31;11(6):262. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-2877. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
5
Green Tattoo Pre-Operative Renal Embolization for Robotic-Assisted and Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: A Practical Proof of a New Technique.用于机器人辅助和腹腔镜下部分肾切除术的绿色纹身术前肾栓塞:一种新技术的实践验证
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 18;11(22):6816. doi: 10.3390/jcm11226816.
6
Selective Arterial Embolization with N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate Prior to CT-Guided Percutaneous Cryoablation of Kidney Malignancies: A Single-Center Experience.在CT引导下经皮冷冻消融肾恶性肿瘤之前使用氰基丙烯酸正丁酯进行选择性动脉栓塞:单中心经验
J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 27;10(21):4986. doi: 10.3390/jcm10214986.
7
Renal Artery Embolization for Neoplastic Conditions.用于肿瘤性疾病的肾动脉栓塞术
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2020 Oct;37(4):420-425. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1715884. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
8
Renal Artery Embolization Before Radical Nephrectomy for Complex Renal Tumour: Which are the True Advantages?复杂肾肿瘤根治性肾切除术前行肾动脉栓塞术:真正的优势有哪些?
Open Med (Wars). 2019 Nov 7;14:797-804. doi: 10.1515/med-2019-0095. eCollection 2019.
9
Lung metastases regression with increased CD8+ T lymphocyte infiltration following preoperative spinal embolization and total en bloc spondylectomy using tumor-bearing frozen autograft in a patient with spinal metastatic leiomyosarcoma.肺转移瘤经术前脊柱栓塞和全脊椎整块切除术(使用含肿瘤冷冻自体移植物)治疗后,CD8+T 淋巴细胞浸润增加,伴脊柱转移平滑肌肉瘤患者肺转移瘤消退。
Eur Spine J. 2019 Jun;28(Suppl 2):41-50. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5831-6. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
10
Use of angioembolization in urology: a review.血管栓塞术在泌尿外科的应用:综述
Transl Androl Urol. 2018 Aug;7(4):535-544. doi: 10.21037/tau.2018.05.12.