Thomas K A, Burr R
Department of Family and Child Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle 98195, USA.
J Perinatol. 1999 Jun;19(4):264-70. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7200183.
Incubator thermal environments produced by skin versus air servo-control were compared.
Infant abdominal skin and incubator air temperatures were recorded from 18 infants in skin servo-control and 14 infants in air servo-control (26- to 29-week gestational age, 14 +/- 2 days postnatal age) for 24 hours. Differences in incubator and infant temperature, neutral thermal environment (NTE) maintenance, and infant and incubator circadian rhythm were examined using analysis of variance and scatterplots.
Skin servo-control resulted in more variable air temperature, yet more stable infant temperature, and more time within the NTE. Circadian rhythm of both infant and incubator temperature differed by control mode and the relationship between incubator and infant temperature rhythms was a function of control mode.
The differences between incubator control modes extend beyond temperature stability and maintenance of NTE. Circadian rhythm of incubator and infant temperatures is influenced by incubator control.
比较皮肤伺服控制与空气伺服控制产生的培养箱热环境。
记录了18名采用皮肤伺服控制的婴儿和14名采用空气伺服控制的婴儿(胎龄26至29周,出生后14±2天)的婴儿腹部皮肤温度和培养箱空气温度,持续24小时。使用方差分析和散点图检查了培养箱和婴儿温度的差异、中性热环境(NTE)维持情况以及婴儿和培养箱的昼夜节律。
皮肤伺服控制导致空气温度变化更大,但婴儿温度更稳定,且在NTE内的时间更多。婴儿和培养箱温度的昼夜节律因控制模式而异,培养箱和婴儿温度节律之间的关系是控制模式的函数。
培养箱控制模式之间的差异不仅限于温度稳定性和NTE维持。培养箱控制会影响培养箱和婴儿温度的昼夜节律。