Unoki K, Kasuga T, Matsushima E, Ohta K
Graduate School of Humanities and Sciences, Ochanomizu University, Tokyo, Japan.
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1999 Dec;53(6):635-42. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1819.1999.00618.x.
In order to investigate attentional processing of emotional information in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), 14 patients with OCD and 28 normal control (NC) subjects were asked to name the background colors of anxiety-relevant, compulsion-relevant, positive and neutral words (an emotional Stroop color-naming test). The stimulus words were presented subliminally, and supraliminally. The time of subliminal presentation for each subject was determined in advance by the lexical decision task. In the subliminal condition, the delay for anxiety- and compulsion-relevant words, when compared with neutral words, was greater in OCD patients, while no difference was found in NC subjects. In the supraliminal condition, no delay was found for both OCD patients and NC subjects. In other words, OCD patients were more sensitive to threat information when it could not be identified with consciousness. Moreover, the present study compared checking OCD with cleaning OCD in the attentional processing of emotional information. As a result, it was found that checking OCD patients responded more slowly in naming the background color of subliminal emotional words than cleaning OCD patients. The results indicate that OCD patients, especially with checking compulsion, may have a deficit in automatic processing of threat information.
为了研究强迫症(OCD)患者对情绪信息的注意力加工情况,14名强迫症患者和28名正常对照(NC)受试者被要求说出与焦虑相关、与强迫行为相关、积极和中性词汇的背景颜色(一种情绪Stroop颜色命名测试)。刺激词以阈下和阈上两种方式呈现。每个受试者的阈下呈现时间预先通过词汇判断任务确定。在阈下条件下,与中性词相比,强迫症患者对与焦虑和强迫行为相关词汇的反应延迟更大,而正常对照受试者未发现差异。在阈上条件下,强迫症患者和正常对照受试者均未发现延迟。换句话说,当威胁信息无法被意识识别时,强迫症患者对其更敏感。此外,本研究在情绪信息的注意力加工方面比较了检查型强迫症和清洗型强迫症。结果发现,检查型强迫症患者在命名阈下情绪词汇的背景颜色时比清洗型强迫症患者反应更慢。结果表明,强迫症患者,尤其是有检查强迫行为的患者,在威胁信息的自动加工方面可能存在缺陷。