Krug H, Broadwell L K, Berry M, DeLapp R, Palmer R H, Mahowald M
Veterans Administration Medical Center and University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Clin Ther. 2000 Jan;22(1):40-52. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(00)87976-x.
The purpose of this study was to compare the tolerability and efficacy of nabumetone and naproxen in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The occurrence of gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events was compared.
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have similar efficacy at equipotent doses, but the therapeutic response to various NSAIDs often differs in individual patients.
This was a 3-month, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, parallel-group study conducted in adult patients with RA. The study had 2 phases: a 3- to 14-day washout period and a 12-week treatment period. During the treatment phase, the tolerability and efficacy of nabumetone 2000 mg/d were compared with those of naproxen 1000 mg/d. The change from baseline in efficacy variables, including global assessments, number of tender or swollen joints, and pain, was evaluated. The study was sized to provide an 80% power to detect a 15% difference in the percentage improvement on the physician's global assessment (alpha = 0.05). GI safety was assessed by monitoring the occurrence of clinically important adverse GI events.
A total of 346 RA patients at 31 US rheumatology centers were randomly assigned to treatment (173 patients per group). The study population was predominantly white (87.0%) and female (70.5%), with a mean age of 54 years. Both treatments improved the signs and symptoms of RA, with no statistically significant differences between groups for any efficacy variables. No serious GI adverse events occurred with either NSAID. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events in both groups were predominantly GI in origin, as were those that resulted in withdrawal from the study. Diarrhea with lower abdominal pain was the most common adverse event in the nabumetone group; upper abdominal pain was the most common adverse event in the naproxen group. The only significant difference between the 2 groups was a higher incidence of diarrhea (P < 0.01) in patients receiving nabumetone.
Nabumetone 2000 mg/d was as effective as naproxen 1000 mg/d in relieving the signs and symptoms of RA. In this study, no serious GI adverse events were observed with either NSAID, but nabumetone was associated with a higher incidence of diarrhea.
本研究旨在比较萘丁美酮和萘普生治疗类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的耐受性和疗效。比较胃肠道(GI)不良事件的发生情况。
非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)在等效剂量下具有相似的疗效,但不同NSAIDs在个体患者中的治疗反应往往不同。
这是一项针对成年RA患者进行的为期3个月的随机、双盲、多中心、平行组研究。该研究有2个阶段:3至14天的洗脱期和12周的治疗期。在治疗阶段,将2000 mg/d萘丁美酮的耐受性和疗效与1000 mg/d萘普生的耐受性和疗效进行比较。评估包括整体评估、压痛或肿胀关节数量以及疼痛等疗效变量相对于基线的变化。该研究的样本量设计为有80%的把握度检测出医生整体评估改善百分比上15%的差异(α = 0.05)。通过监测具有临床意义的胃肠道不良事件的发生情况来评估胃肠道安全性。
美国31个风湿病中心的346例RA患者被随机分配接受治疗(每组173例患者)。研究人群主要为白人(87.0%)和女性(70.5%),平均年龄54岁。两种治疗均改善了RA的体征和症状,各疗效变量在组间无统计学显著差异。两种NSAIDs均未发生严重胃肠道不良事件。两组中最常见的与治疗相关的不良事件主要源于胃肠道,导致退出研究的不良事件也是如此。下腹部疼痛伴腹泻是萘丁美酮组最常见的不良事件;上腹部疼痛是萘普生组最常见的不良事件。两组之间唯一的显著差异是接受萘丁美酮治疗的患者腹泻发生率较高(P < 0.01)。
2000 mg/d萘丁美酮在缓解RA体征和症状方面与1000 mg/d萘普生同样有效。在本研究中,两种NSAIDs均未观察到严重胃肠道不良事件,但萘丁美酮与较高的腹泻发生率相关。