Graduate Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Sorocaba, Sorocaba, State of São Paulo, Brazil.
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 7;16(4):e0248866. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248866. eCollection 2021.
Evidence on the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and corticoids for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is inconclusive and is not up to date. This systematic review assessed the effectiveness and safety of these anti-inflammatories (AI) in the treatment of RA. COCHRANE (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science and Virtual Health Library were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCT) with adults which used AI (dose represented in mg/day) compared with placebo or active controls and was carried out up to December of 2019. Reviewers, in pairs and independently, selected studies, performed the data extraction and assessed the risk of bias. The quality of the evidence was assessed by GRADE. Network meta-analyses were performed using the Stata v.14.2. Twenty-six articles were selected (NSAIDs = 21 and corticoids = 5). Naproxen 1,000 improved physical function, reduced pain and the number of painful joints compared to placebo. Etoricoxib 90 reduced the number of painful joints compared to placebo. Naproxen 750 reduced the number of swollen joints, except for etoricoxib 90. Naproxen 1,000, etoricoxib 90 and diclofenac 150 were better than placebo regarding patient assessment. Assessment physician showed that NSAIDs were better than placebo. Meta-analyses were not performed for prednisolone and prednisone. Naproxen 1,000 was the most effective drug and celecoxib 200 showed fewer adverse events. However, the low quality of the evidence observed for the outcomes with NSAIDs, the absence of meta-analyses to assess the outcomes with corticoids, as well as the risk of bias observed, indicate that future RCT can confirm such findings.
关于非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)和皮质类固醇治疗类风湿关节炎(RA)的证据尚无定论,也已过时。本系统评价评估了这些抗炎药(AI)在治疗 RA 中的有效性和安全性。Cochrane(CENTRAL)、MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、Web of Science 和 Virtual Health Library 用于确定使用 AI(以 mg/天表示剂量)与安慰剂或活性对照比较的成年人随机对照试验(RCT),检索截止日期为 2019 年 12 月。审查员成对并独立地选择研究、进行数据提取和评估偏倚风险。使用 Stata v.14.2 评估证据质量。使用网络荟萃分析。选择了 26 篇文章(NSAIDs=21 篇,皮质类固醇=5 篇)。与安慰剂相比,萘普生 1000 改善了身体功能,减轻了疼痛和疼痛关节的数量。与安慰剂相比,依托考昔 90 减少了疼痛关节的数量。与安慰剂相比,萘普生 750 减少了肿胀关节的数量,除了依托考昔 90。萘普生 1000、依托考昔 90 和双氯芬酸 150 在患者评估方面优于安慰剂。评估医生表明,NSAIDs 优于安慰剂。未对泼尼松龙和泼尼松进行荟萃分析。萘普生 1000 是最有效的药物,塞来昔布 200 显示不良反应较少。然而,观察到 NSAIDs 结局的证据质量低,缺乏荟萃分析评估皮质类固醇的结局,以及观察到的偏倚风险,表明未来的 RCT 可以证实这些发现。