• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于调查头枕位置在减少后部碰撞中颈部损伤方面重要性的报告。

Report investigating the importance of head restraint positioning in reducing neck injury in rear impact.

作者信息

Maher J

机构信息

Federal Office of Road Safety, Canberra ACT, Australia.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2000 Mar;32(2):299-305. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(99)00127-x.

DOI:10.1016/s0001-4575(99)00127-x
PMID:10688486
Abstract

Neck injury resulting from rear impact (often known as whiplash) is a serious cause of road trauma. It is often underestimated or overlooked because such injuries are minor on traditional injury scales but can result in long term pain and disability. The paper begins with a brief review of research into head restraints and whiplash done so far. A review of international head restraint regulations revealed the absence of any horizontal offset requirements. A review of seat strength requirements and testing procedures showed that a regulation that required a collapsible seat would involve significant compliance testing. This paper concludes a preliminary project conducted by the Federal Office of Road Safety (FORS) where the head restraints for twenty Australian market vehicles were assessed using known performance criteria. A key finding of the report was that most of the vehicles allowed for vertical adjustment of the head restraint. Also important was that none of the vehicles measured allowed horizontal adjustment and on some of the head restraints the horizontal displacement increased as the vertical height increased. As the understanding of neck injury mechanisms in rear impact develops, there may be some scope for FORS to facilitate the improvement of these standards. Further research into neck injury mechanisms may reveal yielding seat backs or new 'active' head restraint technology as a more effective countermeasure. In the meantime, educating occupants to correctly adjust their head restraints seems to be an effective way to reduce injuries in existing vehicles.

摘要

后向碰撞导致的颈部损伤(通常称为挥鞭伤)是道路创伤的一个严重原因。由于此类损伤在传统损伤量表上程度较轻,但可能导致长期疼痛和残疾,所以常常被低估或忽视。本文首先简要回顾了迄今为止对头部保护装置和挥鞭伤的研究。对国际头部保护装置法规的审查发现,其中没有任何水平偏移要求。对座椅强度要求和测试程序的审查表明,要求座椅可折叠的法规将涉及大量的合规测试。本文总结了联邦道路安全办公室(FORS)开展的一个初步项目,该项目使用已知的性能标准对20款澳大利亚市场车辆的头部保护装置进行了评估。该报告的一个关键发现是,大多数车辆的头部保护装置允许垂直调节。同样重要的是,所测量的车辆中没有一辆允许水平调节,而且在一些头部保护装置上,水平位移随着垂直高度的增加而增大。随着对后向碰撞中颈部损伤机制的认识不断发展,FORS可能有一定空间来推动这些标准的改进。对颈部损伤机制的进一步研究可能会揭示出可屈服的座椅靠背或新的“主动式”头部保护装置技术是更有效的对策。与此同时,教育驾乘人员正确调节他们的头部保护装置似乎是减少现有车辆中损伤的一种有效方法。

相似文献

1
Report investigating the importance of head restraint positioning in reducing neck injury in rear impact.关于调查头枕位置在减少后部碰撞中颈部损伤方面重要性的报告。
Accid Anal Prev. 2000 Mar;32(2):299-305. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(99)00127-x.
2
The effectiveness of active head restraint in preventing whiplash.主动式头枕在预防挥鞭伤方面的有效性。
J Trauma. 2001 Nov;51(5):959-69. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200111000-00022.
3
Real-world adjustments of driver seat and head restraint in Saab 9-3 vehicles.萨博9-3汽车驾驶员座椅和头枕的实际调整情况。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2017 May 19;18(4):398-405. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2016.1217522. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
4
Whiplash injury--are current head restraints doing their job?挥鞭伤——当前的头枕能起到作用吗?
Accid Anal Prev. 2000 Mar;32(2):177-85. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(99)00092-5.
5
Head restraints--the neglected countermeasure.头枕——被忽视的对策。
Accid Anal Prev. 2000 Mar;32(2):143-50. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(99)00057-3.
6
Seat properties affecting neck responses in rear crashes: a reason why whiplash has increased.影响追尾事故中颈部反应的座椅特性:鞭打损伤增加的一个原因。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2003 Sep;4(3):214-27. doi: 10.1080/15389580309877.
7
Does knowledge of seat design and whiplash injury mechanisms translate to understanding outcomes?座椅设计和挥鞭伤机制方面的知识是否能转化为对结果的理解?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Dec 1;36(25 Suppl):S187-93. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182387eff.
8
Seat back and head restraint response during low-speed rear-end automobile collisions.低速汽车追尾碰撞时座椅靠背和头枕的响应
Accid Anal Prev. 2000 Mar;32(2):219-32. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(99)00108-6.
9
Relationships between seat properties and human subject kinematics in rear impact tests.后碰撞试验中座椅特性与人体运动学之间的关系。
Accid Anal Prev. 2001 May;33(3):289-304. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(00)00043-9.
10
Effects of head restraint and seat redesign on neck injury risk in rear-end crashes.头部保护装置和座椅重新设计对追尾碰撞中颈部受伤风险的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2003 Jun;4(2):83-90. doi: 10.1080/15389580309867.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge and application of correct car seat head restraint usage among chiropractic college interns: a cross-sectional study.脊椎按摩疗法学院实习生对正确使用汽车座椅头枕的知识与应用:一项横断面研究。
J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2005 Mar;49(1):32-9.
2
Whiplash associated disorders: a review of the literature to guide patient information and advice.挥鞭样相关疾病:文献综述以指导患者信息与建议
Emerg Med J. 2002 Nov;19(6):499-506. doi: 10.1136/emj.19.6.499.