Suppr超能文献

大鼠延迟与痕迹眨眼条件反射的个体发生

Ontogeny of delay versus trace eyeblink conditioning in the rat.

作者信息

Ivkovich D, Paczkowski C M, Stanton M E

机构信息

Department of Psychology: Experimental, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708-0086, USA.

出版信息

Dev Psychobiol. 2000 Mar;36(2):148-60. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2302(200003)36:2<148::aid-dev6>3.0.co;2-l.

Abstract

The ontogeny of delay versus trace eyeblink conditioning was examined in 19-, 23-, and 30-day-old rat pups. Pairings of a tone conditioned stimulus (CS) and periocular shock unconditioned stimulus (US; 100-ms) were presented in one of three conditioning paradigms: standard delay [380-ms CS, 280-ms interstimulus interval (ISI)], trace (380-ms CS, 500-ms trace interval), or long-delay (980-ms CS, 880-ms ISI). The results of two experiments indicated that standard delay conditioning emerged between 19 and 23 days of age whereas trace and long-delay eyeblink conditioning emerged more slowly from postnatal Days 19 to 30. Because the acquisition profile for long-delay paralleled that of trace and not standard delay, it appears that the relative deficits in the emergence of trace eyeblink conditioning during development reflect difficulty in forming associations over long ISIs rather than the short-term memory demands of the trace conditioning paradigm.

摘要

在19日龄、23日龄和30日龄的幼鼠中研究了延迟与痕迹性眨眼条件反射的个体发生情况。在三种条件反射范式之一中呈现条件刺激(CS,一种音调)和眼周电击非条件刺激(US;100毫秒)的配对:标准延迟(380毫秒CS,280毫秒刺激间隔时间 [ISI])、痕迹(380毫秒CS,500毫秒痕迹间隔)或长延迟(980毫秒CS,880毫秒ISI)。两项实验的结果表明,标准延迟条件反射在19至23日龄之间出现,而痕迹性和长延迟眨眼条件反射从出生后第19天到第30天出现得更慢。由于长延迟的习得情况与痕迹性而非标准延迟的情况相似,因此在发育过程中痕迹性眨眼条件反射出现的相对缺陷似乎反映了在长ISI上形成关联的困难,而不是痕迹性条件反射范式的短期记忆需求。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验