Ivkovich D, Paczkowski C M, Stanton M E
Department of Psychology: Experimental, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708-0086, USA.
Dev Psychobiol. 2000 Mar;36(2):148-60. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2302(200003)36:2<148::aid-dev6>3.0.co;2-l.
The ontogeny of delay versus trace eyeblink conditioning was examined in 19-, 23-, and 30-day-old rat pups. Pairings of a tone conditioned stimulus (CS) and periocular shock unconditioned stimulus (US; 100-ms) were presented in one of three conditioning paradigms: standard delay [380-ms CS, 280-ms interstimulus interval (ISI)], trace (380-ms CS, 500-ms trace interval), or long-delay (980-ms CS, 880-ms ISI). The results of two experiments indicated that standard delay conditioning emerged between 19 and 23 days of age whereas trace and long-delay eyeblink conditioning emerged more slowly from postnatal Days 19 to 30. Because the acquisition profile for long-delay paralleled that of trace and not standard delay, it appears that the relative deficits in the emergence of trace eyeblink conditioning during development reflect difficulty in forming associations over long ISIs rather than the short-term memory demands of the trace conditioning paradigm.
在19日龄、23日龄和30日龄的幼鼠中研究了延迟与痕迹性眨眼条件反射的个体发生情况。在三种条件反射范式之一中呈现条件刺激(CS,一种音调)和眼周电击非条件刺激(US;100毫秒)的配对:标准延迟(380毫秒CS,280毫秒刺激间隔时间 [ISI])、痕迹(380毫秒CS,500毫秒痕迹间隔)或长延迟(980毫秒CS,880毫秒ISI)。两项实验的结果表明,标准延迟条件反射在19至23日龄之间出现,而痕迹性和长延迟眨眼条件反射从出生后第19天到第30天出现得更慢。由于长延迟的习得情况与痕迹性而非标准延迟的情况相似,因此在发育过程中痕迹性眨眼条件反射出现的相对缺陷似乎反映了在长ISI上形成关联的困难,而不是痕迹性条件反射范式的短期记忆需求。