Reid W A, al-Nafussi A I, Rebello G, Williams A R
Department of Pathology, Edinburgh University, Medical School, UK.
J Clin Pathol. 1999 Nov;52(11):825-8. doi: 10.1136/jcp.52.11.825.
To determine the change in information relayed from histopathologists to clinicians by using templates for reporting specimens of uterine cervix sampled by loop excision of the transformation zone (LETZ).
Minimum datasets for the information required from LETZ specimens received from the colposcopy clinic, Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, were incorporated into templates on the clinical service computer (Pinnacle) of the pathology department, University of Edinburgh. Pathologists completed hard copy versions, which were transcribed into the computer templates for report generation. The effect of the changes on the quality of the pathology reports was studied. The number of cases in which each item in the dataset received comment in template generated reports was compared with that in traditional prose reports compiled before the use of the templates and in prose reports issued after the introduction of the templates. Questionnaire studies were undertaken of clinicians' and pathologists' opinions of the template reports.
In the template reports nearly all items received comment in almost 100% of cases. In the prose reports issued both before and after the templates were in use, most items were mentioned in a significantly lower proportion of cases. Clinicians thought the template reports were clearer and the information could be more readily assimilated than from the prose versions.
The use of template reports in these types of specimen allowed more consistent and detailed information transfer. The change appeared to result from the use of the templates rather than from increased awareness of the items to be reported.
通过使用模板来报告经转化区环形切除术(LETZ)采集的子宫颈标本,确定从组织病理学家传递给临床医生的信息变化。
将从爱丁堡皇家医院阴道镜诊所收到的LETZ标本所需信息的最小数据集纳入爱丁堡大学病理科临床服务计算机(Pinnacle)上的模板。病理学家完成硬拷贝版本,然后转录到计算机模板中以生成报告。研究这些变化对病理报告质量的影响。将模板生成报告中数据集中每个项目得到注释的病例数与使用模板之前编制的传统散文式报告以及引入模板后发布的散文式报告中的病例数进行比较。对临床医生和病理学家对模板报告的意见进行问卷调查。
在模板报告中,几乎所有项目在近100%的病例中都得到了注释。在使用模板之前和之后发布的散文式报告中,大多数项目在病例中被提及的比例要低得多。临床医生认为模板报告更清晰,与散文式版本相比,信息更容易理解。
在这类标本中使用模板报告可实现更一致、更详细的信息传递。这种变化似乎是由于使用了模板,而不是因为对要报告的项目的认识提高。