Suppr超能文献

下颌右侧第一磨牙I类汞合金修复体的技术分析

Skills analysis of a class I amalgam restoration in a mandibular right first molar.

作者信息

Salvendy G, Joost M G, Ferguson G W, Wilko R A, Cunningham P R

出版信息

J Dent Educ. 1976 Dec;40(12):787-93.

PMID:1069023
Abstract
  1. Students changed their body position 32% more often than instructors during amalgam condensation. 2. Experienced instructors used 38% fewer strokes than students to condense the amalgam. 3. On the average, instructors used 65% less time per condensation stroke than students. This was not due to ability to move the instrument more quickly, since both students and instructors had similar minimum stroke times, but rather to the fact that instructors performed slowly less often. 4. The upstroke during condensation required nearly the same time for both students and instructors (an eight percent difference). It was the downstroke that was greatly different (a 96% difference). 5. Instructors repeated condensation strokes 22% more often than students, working more systematically with less "jumping around" in the cavity. 6. The total number of carving strokes was not related to experience. 7. Students repeated carving strokes more often than instructors. 8. Students and instructors tended to use the same length of strokes in carving. 9. There was a noticeable difference between instructors and students in the method used to grasp the instruments.
摘要
  1. 在汞合金充填过程中,学生改变身体姿势的频率比教师高32%。2. 经验丰富的教师在充填汞合金时的操作次数比学生少38%。3. 平均而言,教师每次充填操作所用时间比学生少65%。这并非因为教师移动器械的速度更快,因为学生和教师的最短操作时间相近,而是因为教师较少出现操作缓慢的情况。4. 充填过程中的上冲程,学生和教师所需时间几乎相同(相差8%)。差异极大的是下冲程(相差96%)。5. 教师重复充填操作的频率比学生高22%,在窝洞内操作更系统,较少“乱跳”。6. 雕刻操作的总次数与经验无关。7. 学生重复雕刻操作的频率比教师高。8. 学生和教师在雕刻时倾向于使用相同长度的操作。9. 教师和学生在握持器械的方法上存在明显差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验