Mallinson E T, Miller R G, de Rezende C E, Ferris K E, deGraft-Hanson J, Joseph S W
Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Maryland Campus, College Park MD 20742-3711, USA.
J Vet Diagn Invest. 2000 Jan;12(1):83-7. doi: 10.1177/104063870001200119.
The Salmonella detection ability of 2 surfactant-supplemental media, xylose-lysine-tergitol (Nia-proof) 4 (XLT4) and Miller-Mallinson (MM) agar, was compared against that of several commonly used plating media. XLT4 and MM appeared to be the most efficient in detecting Salmonella in meat products and food animal environments. MM was superior to XLT4 in detecting those increasingly more prevalent strains of Salmonella possessing weak to ultraweak H2S production characteristics.
比较了两种添加表面活性剂的培养基——木糖赖氨酸叠氮钠(Nia-proof)4(XLT4)培养基和米勒 - 马林森(MM)琼脂对沙门氏菌的检测能力与几种常用平板培养基的检测能力。XLT4和MM在检测肉制品和食用动物环境中的沙门氏菌方面似乎最为有效。在检测那些越来越普遍的具有从弱到极弱硫化氢产生特性的沙门氏菌菌株时,MM优于XLT4。