Suppr超能文献

免疫血小板计数:一种提议的新参考程序。

Immunoplatelet counting: a proposed new reference procedure.

作者信息

Harrison P, Horton A, Grant D, Briggs C, MacHin S

机构信息

Haemostasis Research, Department of Haematology, 98 Chenies Mews, University College London WC1E 6HX, UK.

出版信息

Br J Haematol. 2000 Feb;108(2):228-35. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2000.01846.x.

Abstract

Given the high degree of interoperator error and poor precision of manual platelet counting, it has recently been proposed that an immunoplatelet counting method could become the new reference procedure. Platelets are identified immunologically with a suitable monoclonal antibody, and the platelet count is derived from the ratio of fluorescent platelet events to collected red blood cell (RBC) events that are also counted by a reliable and calibrated standard impedance counter (RBC ratio). In this study, we have set up a rapid and simple method for immunoplatelet counting and simultaneously compared the RBC ratio with the bead ratio derived from two different preparations of commercial calibration beads (Trucount and FlowCount beads). Comparison of the level of imprecision of the RBC ratio with either the manual count or bead ratios revealed a superior coefficient of variation of < 5% even in samples with a platelet count < 20 x 10(9)/l. The RBC ratio correlated extremely well with the existing manual phase reference method (r2 = 0.93) and especially well with three different commercial impedance counters and a dual-angle optical counter (r2 = 0.98-0.99). However, at < 100 x 10(9)/l, the correlation of the RBC ratio with the dual-angle optical count (ADVIA 120) (r2 = 0.96) was superior to all impedance counters. This suggests that automated optical counting methods may be more accurate at determining platelet counts in thrombocytopenic samples. As the RBC ratio is rapid, cheap and relatively easy to perform, we propose that this method could replace the manual count as a new international reference method.

摘要

鉴于手工血小板计数存在高度的操作者间误差和较差的精密度,最近有人提出免疫血小板计数法可能成为新的参考方法。用合适的单克隆抗体通过免疫学方法识别血小板,血小板计数由荧光血小板事件与收集的红细胞(RBC)事件的比率得出,红细胞事件也由可靠且经过校准的标准阻抗计数器计数(RBC比率)。在本研究中,我们建立了一种快速简便的免疫血小板计数方法,并同时将RBC比率与来自两种不同商业校准微珠制剂(Trucount和FlowCount微珠)的微珠比率进行比较。将RBC比率的不精密度水平与手工计数或微珠比率进行比较发现,即使在血小板计数<20×10⁹/L的样本中,变异系数也<5%,表现优异。RBC比率与现有的手工相参考方法相关性极佳(r² = 0.93),与三种不同的商业阻抗计数器和一种双角度光学计数器相关性尤其好(r² = 0.98 - 0.99)。然而,在血小板计数<100×10⁹/L时,RBC比率与双角度光学计数(ADVIA 120)的相关性(r² = 0.96)优于所有阻抗计数器。这表明在确定血小板减少样本中的血小板计数时,自动化光学计数方法可能更准确。由于RBC比率快速、廉价且相对易于操作,我们建议该方法可取代手工计数成为新的国际参考方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验