Suppr超能文献

1型血管性血友病——关于诊断、ABO血型的影响及出血史作用的临床回顾性研究

Type 1 von Willebrand disease - a clinical retrospective study of the diagnosis, the influence of the ABO blood group and the role of the bleeding history.

作者信息

Nitu-Whalley I C, Lee C A, Griffioen A, Jenkins P V, Pasi K J

机构信息

Haemophilia Centre and Haemostasis Unit, Department of Haematology, Royal Free and University College Medical School of University College of London, Pond Street, London, UK.

出版信息

Br J Haematol. 2000 Feb;108(2):259-64. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2000.01830.x.

Abstract

This clinical retrospective study investigated the difficulties in diagnosing type 1 von Willebrand disease (VWD). A total of 246 patients previously diagnosed with type 1 VWD were reclassified into 'possible' type 1 VWD (patients with low levels of VWF adjusted for the blood group and either a significant bleeding history or family history) and 'definite' type 1 VWD, requiring low levels of von Willebrand factor (VWF), a bleeding history and inheritance. On reclassification, only 144/246 (59%) patients had low VWF levels adjusted for blood group, 88/246 (36%) patients met all the criteria for 'definite' type 1 VWD and 51/246 (21%) patients were 'possible' type 1 VWD. A significant proportion of patients, 102/246 (42%), remained an indeterminate group with blood type O, VWF levels between 35 and 50 U/dl and personal and/or family bleeding history. This subgroup might require reclassification as 'not VWD'. However, a similar bleeding tendency was found in two matched groups of patients of blood groups O and non-O and VWF levels between 35 and 50 U/dl. These results suggest that the use of ABO adjusted ranges for VWF levels might not be essential for diagnosis, because bleeding symptoms may depend on the VWF level regardless of the ABO type. Of the diagnostic criteria, the bleeding history was of prime importance in the clinical decision to diagnose and treat type 1 VWD. These observations could help in the reconsideration of how the criteria for diagnosing type 1 VWD could be adjusted in order to maximize their clinical relevance.

摘要

这项临床回顾性研究调查了1型血管性血友病(VWD)的诊断难点。共有246例先前被诊断为1型VWD的患者被重新分类为“可能的”1型VWD(根据血型调整的血管性血友病因子(VWF)水平较低且有明显出血史或家族史的患者)和“确诊的”1型VWD,后者要求VWF水平低、有出血史且有遗传倾向。重新分类后,仅144/246(59%)的患者根据血型调整后的VWF水平较低,88/246(36%)的患者符合“确诊的”1型VWD的所有标准,51/246(21%)的患者为“可能的”1型VWD。相当一部分患者,102/246(42%),仍为不确定组,血型为O型,VWF水平在35至50 U/dl之间,有个人和/或家族出血史。该亚组可能需要重新分类为“非VWD”。然而,在两组匹配的血型为O型和非O型、VWF水平在35至50 U/dl之间的患者中发现了相似的出血倾向。这些结果表明,使用根据ABO血型调整的VWF水平范围可能对诊断并非至关重要,因为出血症状可能取决于VWF水平,而与ABO血型无关。在诊断标准中,出血史在1型VWD诊断和治疗的临床决策中至关重要。这些观察结果有助于重新考虑如何调整1型VWD的诊断标准,以使其临床相关性最大化。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验