Ruggenenti P, Mosconi L, Vendramin G, Moriggi M, Remuzzi A, Sangalli F, Remuzzi G
Department of Kidney Research, Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, Bergamo, Italy.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2000 Mar;35(3):381-91. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(00)70190-9.
Patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) and persistent nephrotic-range proteinuria are at risk for progression to end-stage renal failure. Whether angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are also renoprotective in these patients remains elusive. In 14 patients with IMN (patients) and persistent proteinuria (protein > 3 g/24 h for >6 months), we studied mean arterial pressure (MAP), urinary protein excretion, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), renal plasma flow (RPF), and albumin and neutral dextran fractional clearance after 2 months washout from previous antihypertensive treatment (basal), after 2 months of enalapril (2.5 to 20 mg/d) therapy (posttreatment), and 2 months after enalapril withdrawal (recovery). MAP, proteinuria, and GFR were also measured at the same time points in 6 patients with IMN and persistent overt proteinuria maintained on conventional treatment throughout the study period (controls). Basal MAP, proteinuria, and GFR were similar in the two study groups. However, in patients at the end of the treatment period, MAP (posttreatment, 99.6 +/- 11.2 versus basal, 103.3 +/- 12.1 mm Hg; P < 0.05), proteinuria (posttreatment protein, 5.0 +/- 2.9 versus basal, 7.1 +/- 4.9 g/24 h; P < 0.05), albumin fractional clearance (posttreatment median, 1.7 x 10(-3); range, 0.2 to 22.7 x 10(-3) versus basal median, 4.1 x 10(-3); range, 0.4 to 22. 1 x 10(-3); P < 0.05), and fractional clearance of largest neutral dextrans (radii from 62 to 66 A) were significantly less than basal values. At recovery, MAP significantly increased to 106.6 +/- 11.7 mm Hg (P < 0.001 versus enalapril), but all other parameters remained less than basal values. GFR and RPF were similar at each evaluation. Changes in proteinuria after treatment withdrawal positively correlated (r = 0.72; P < 0.01) with baseline GFR. Theoretical analysis of dextran-sieving data indicated that ACE inhibitor treatment significantly improved glomerular membrane size-selective dysfunction. This effect persisted more than 2 months after treatment withdrawal. No patient had symptomatic hypotension, acute renal function deterioration, or hyperkalemia during enalapril treatment. Thus, in patients with IMN and long-term nephrotic syndrome, ACE inhibitor treatment, but not conventional therapy, improves glomerular barrier size selectivity. The antiproteinuric effect of ACE inhibition is long lasting, especially in patients with more severe renal insufficiency. This is the premise of a long-term renoprotective effect that may limit the need for treatment with more toxic drugs.
特发性膜性肾病(IMN)且持续性肾病范围蛋白尿的患者有进展至终末期肾衰竭的风险。血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂在这些患者中是否也具有肾脏保护作用仍不清楚。在14例IMN患者(研究对象)且持续性蛋白尿(蛋白尿>3 g/24 h持续>6个月)中,我们研究了从先前抗高血压治疗洗脱2个月后(基础期)、依那普利(2.5至20 mg/d)治疗2个月后(治疗后)以及依那普利撤药2个月后(恢复期)的平均动脉压(MAP)、尿蛋白排泄、肾小球滤过率(GFR)、肾血浆流量(RPF)以及白蛋白和中性右旋糖酐分数清除率。在整个研究期间接受常规治疗的6例IMN且持续性显性蛋白尿患者(对照组)中,在相同时间点也测量了MAP、蛋白尿和GFR。两个研究组的基础MAP、蛋白尿和GFR相似。然而,在治疗期末,研究对象的MAP(治疗后,99.6±11.2 vs基础期,103.3±12.1 mmHg;P<0.05)、蛋白尿(治疗后蛋白,5.0±2.9 vs基础期,7.1±4.9 g/24 h;P<0.05)、白蛋白分数清除率(治疗后中位数,1.7×10⁻³;范围,0.2至22.7×10⁻³ vs基础期中位数,4.1×10⁻³;范围,0.4至22.1×10⁻³;P<0.05)以及最大中性右旋糖酐(半径62至�埃)的分数清除率均显著低于基础值。在恢复期,MAP显著升高至106.6±11.7 mmHg(与依那普利相比,P<0.001),但所有其他参数仍低于基础值。每次评估时GFR和RPF相似。撤药后蛋白尿的变化与基线GFR呈正相关(r = 0.72;P<0.01)。对右旋糖酐筛分数据的理论分析表明,ACE抑制剂治疗显著改善了肾小球膜大小选择性功能障碍。这种作用在撤药后持续超过2个月。依那普利治疗期间无患者出现症状性低血压、急性肾功能恶化或高钾血症。因此,在IMN和长期肾病综合征患者中,ACE抑制剂治疗而非常规治疗可改善肾小球屏障大小选择性。ACE抑制的抗蛋白尿作用持久,尤其是在肾功能不全更严重的患者中。这是长期肾脏保护作用的前提,可能会减少使用毒性更大药物进行治疗的需求。