Hamilton C M, Lee H, Li P L, Cook D M, Piper K R, von Bodman S B, Lanka E, Ream W, Farrand S K
Departments of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA.
J Bacteriol. 2000 Mar;182(6):1541-8. doi: 10.1128/JB.182.6.1541-1548.2000.
Plasmid conjugation systems are composed of two components, the DNA transfer and replication system, or Dtr, and the mating pair formation system, or Mpf. During conjugal transfer an essential factor, called the coupling protein, is thought to interface the Dtr, in the form of the relaxosome, with the Mpf, in the form of the mating bridge. These proteins, such as TraG from the IncP1 plasmid RP4 (TraG(RP4)) and TraG and VirD4 from the conjugal transfer and T-DNA transfer systems of Ti plasmids, are believed to dictate specificity of the interactions that can occur between different Dtr and Mpf components. The Ti plasmids of Agrobacterium tumefaciens do not mobilize vectors containing the oriT of RP4, but these IncP1 plasmid derivatives lack the trans-acting Dtr functions and TraG(RP4). A. tumefaciens donors transferred a chimeric plasmid that contains the oriT and Dtr genes of RP4 and the Mpf genes of pTiC58, indicating that the Ti plasmid mating bridge can interact with the RP4 relaxosome. However, the Ti plasmid did not mobilize transfer from an IncQ relaxosome. The Ti plasmid did mobilize such plasmids if TraG(RP4) was expressed in the donors. Mutations in traG(RP4) with defined effects on the RP4 transfer system exhibited similar phenotypes for Ti plasmid-mediated mobilization of the IncQ vector. When provided with VirD4, the tra system of pTiC58 mobilized plasmids from the IncQ relaxosome. However, neither TraG(RP4) nor VirD4 restored transfer to a traG mutant of the Ti plasmid. VirD4 also failed to complement a traG(RP4) mutant for transfer from the RP4 relaxosome or for RP4-mediated mobilization from the IncQ relaxosome. TraG(RP4)-mediated mobilization of the IncQ plasmid by pTiC58 did not inhibit Ti plasmid transfer, suggesting that the relaxosomes of the two plasmids do not compete for the same mating bridge. We conclude that TraG(RP4) and VirD4 couples the IncQ but not the Ti plasmid relaxosome to the Ti plasmid mating bridge. However, VirD4 cannot couple the IncP1 or the IncQ relaxosome to the RP4 mating bridge. These results support a model in which the coupling proteins specify the interactions between Dtr and Mpf components of mating systems.
质粒接合系统由两个部分组成,即DNA转移与复制系统(Dtr)和交配配对形成系统(Mpf)。在接合转移过程中,一种名为偶联蛋白的关键因子被认为以松弛体的形式将Dtr与以交配桥形式存在的Mpf连接起来。这些蛋白,如来自IncP1质粒RP4的TraG(TraG(RP4))以及来自Ti质粒接合转移和T-DNA转移系统的TraG和VirD4,被认为决定了不同Dtr和Mpf组分之间可能发生的相互作用的特异性。根癌土壤杆菌的Ti质粒不能动员含有RP4 oriT的载体,但这些IncP1质粒衍生物缺乏反式作用的Dtr功能和TraG(RP4)。根癌土壤杆菌供体转移了一种嵌合质粒,该质粒含有RP4的oriT和Dtr基因以及pTiC58的Mpf基因,这表明Ti质粒交配桥可以与RP4松弛体相互作用。然而,Ti质粒不能动员来自IncQ松弛体的转移。如果在供体中表达TraG(RP4),Ti质粒就能动员这类质粒。对RP4转移系统有明确影响的traG(RP4)突变在Ti质粒介导的IncQ载体动员中表现出相似的表型。当提供VirD4时,pTiC58的tra系统能动员来自IncQ松弛体的质粒。然而,TraG(RP4)和VirD4都不能恢复Ti质粒traG突变体的转移。VirD4也不能补充traG(RP4)突变体从RP4松弛体的转移或从IncQ松弛体的RP4介导的动员。pTiC58通过TraG(RP4)介导的IncQ质粒动员并不抑制Ti质粒转移,这表明两种质粒的松弛体不会竞争同一个交配桥。我们得出结论,TraG(RP4)和VirD4将IncQ而非Ti质粒松弛体与Ti质粒交配桥偶联起来。然而,VirD4不能将IncP1或IncQ松弛体与RP4交配桥偶联起来。这些结果支持了一个模型,即偶联蛋白决定了交配系统中Dtr和Mpf组分之间的相互作用。