Ehrler D M, Vaccaro A R
OMNI Orthopaedics, Canton, Ohio, USA.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000 Feb(371):38-45. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200002000-00005.
Bone grafting is an integral part of many lumbar spinal surgeries. The two choices of bone are autograft and allograft. Each source has its own advantages and disadvantages. The current study is a literature review of allograft bone use in lumbar spine surgery. Allograft bone can be procured in greater quantities than autograft. With standard protocols of harvesting, the risk of disease transfer is negligible. Only fresh-frozen and freeze-dried products are used. Allografts are incorporated slower and to a lesser degree than autografts. Fresh-frozen grafts are stronger, more immunogenic and more completely incorporated than freeze-dried grafts. Allografts used alone or combined with autografts for posterior lumbar spinal procedures have decreased fusion rates compared with autografts. If used anteriorly, allografts are well suited for reconstructive procedures and have good fusion rates, especially if combined with posterior fusions. If used in the proper situations, allograft bone can be used successfully in lumbar spine surgeries.
骨移植是许多腰椎手术不可或缺的一部分。骨的两种选择是自体骨移植和同种异体骨移植。每种来源都有其自身的优缺点。当前的研究是对腰椎手术中同种异体骨使用情况的文献综述。同种异体骨的获取量可比自体骨更多。采用标准的采集方案时,疾病传播风险可忽略不计。仅使用新鲜冷冻和冻干产品。同种异体骨的融合速度比自体骨慢,融合程度也较低。新鲜冷冻移植物比冻干移植物更强、免疫原性更高且融合更完全。与自体骨相比,用于腰椎后路手术单独使用或与自体骨联合使用的同种异体骨融合率降低。如果用于前路,同种异体骨非常适合重建手术且融合率良好,特别是与后路融合联合使用时。如果在适当的情况下使用,同种异体骨可成功用于腰椎手术。