• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与单独和同时施加的垂直运动相关的横向全身振动的意义。ISO 2631的验证研究。

The significance of lateral whole-body vibrations related to separately and simultaneously applied vertical motions. A validation study of ISO 2631.

作者信息

Griefahn B, Bröde P

机构信息

Institute for Occupational Physiology at the University of Dortmund, Germany.

出版信息

Appl Ergon. 1999 Dec;30(6):505-13. doi: 10.1016/s0003-6870(99)00021-6.

DOI:10.1016/s0003-6870(99)00021-6
PMID:10693830
Abstract

Sensitivity of lateral motions relative to vertical motions were determined and compared to predictions provided by ISO 2631. Two experiments were executed where lateral and vertical motions were applied consecutively or simultaneously and where the magnitude of a single- or dual-axis test signal was adjusted until it was judged as equivalent to a preceding single-axis reference motion of the same frequency. Experiment 1: References consisted of vertical sinusoidal motions presented with 1.6-12.5 Hz and weighted accelerations of a(zw) = 0.3, 0.6 and 1.2 m s(-2) r.m.s., single-axis test signals were lateral motions of the same frequency. 26 subjects (15 men, 11 women, 20-56 yr) participated in the experiments. Accelerations adjusted for lateral vibrations above 1.6 Hz were considerably lower than predicted suggesting that the weighting factors provided in ISO 2631 are incorrect. Experiment 2: References consisted of single-axis vertical or lateral sinusoidal motions presented with 1.6-12.5 Hz and a weighted acceleration of a(zw) = 1.25 m s(-2) r.m.s. The dual-axis test signals consisted of a constant fraction of the reference acceleration (10, 25, 50, 75, 90%) and a perpendicularly oriented adjustable component. 31 subjects (15 men, 16 women, 19-51 yr) participated in the experiments. Both experiments revealed that ISO 2631 is qualitatively valid, the weighting of lateral motions above 1.6 Hz, however, should be increased in order to meet the actual sensitivity particularly in case of multi-axis vibrations.

摘要

确定了横向运动相对于垂直运动的敏感度,并与ISO 2631提供的预测结果进行了比较。进行了两项实验,其中横向和垂直运动相继或同时施加,并且单轴或双轴测试信号的幅度被调整,直到被判定等同于相同频率的先前单轴参考运动。实验1:参考由频率为1.6 - 12.5 Hz且加权加速度a(zw) = 0.3、0.6和1.2 m s(-2) r.m.s.的垂直正弦运动组成,单轴测试信号为相同频率的横向运动。26名受试者(15名男性,11名女性,年龄20 - 56岁)参与了实验。对于高于1.6 Hz的横向振动所调整的加速度远低于预测值,这表明ISO 2631中提供的加权因子是不正确的。实验2:参考由频率为1.6 - 12.5 Hz且加权加速度a(zw) = 1.25 m s(-2) r.m.s.的单轴垂直或横向正弦运动组成。双轴测试信号由参考加速度的恒定比例(10%、25%、50%、75%、90%)和一个垂直方向的可调分量组成。31名受试者(15名男性,16名女性,年龄19 - 51岁)参与了实验。两项实验均表明ISO 2631在定性上是有效的,然而,为了满足实际敏感度,尤其是在多轴振动的情况下,高于1.6 Hz的横向运动的加权应该增加。

相似文献

1
The significance of lateral whole-body vibrations related to separately and simultaneously applied vertical motions. A validation study of ISO 2631.与单独和同时施加的垂直运动相关的横向全身振动的意义。ISO 2631的验证研究。
Appl Ergon. 1999 Dec;30(6):505-13. doi: 10.1016/s0003-6870(99)00021-6.
2
Equivalent sensation curves of simultaneous lateral and vertical sinusoidal whole-body vibration.同时进行横向和垂直正弦全身振动的等效感觉曲线。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1998 Oct;69(10):986-91.
3
Examination of the frequency-weighting curve for accelerations measured on the seat and at the surface supporting the feet during horizontal whole-body vibrations in x- and y-directions.检查在 x 和 y 方向的水平全身振动期间,在座位上和支撑脚部的表面上测量的加速度的频率加权曲线。
Ind Health. 2010;48(5):725-42. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.mswbvi-06.
4
Frequency-dependence of discomfort caused by vibration and mechanical shocks.振动和机械冲击引起的不适的频率依赖性。
Ergonomics. 2018 Aug;61(8):1102-1115. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1429674. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
5
Subjective effects of combined-axis vibration: II. Comparison of X-axis and X-plus-pitch vibrations.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1985 Jun;56(6):559-63.
6
Biodynamic responses of the seated human body to single-axis and dual-axis vibration.坐姿人体对单轴和双轴振动的动力响应。
Ind Health. 2010;48(5):615-27. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.mswbvi-26.
7
Subjective effects of combined-axis vibration: comparison of Y-axis and Y-plus-roll vibrations.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1984 May;55(5):387-90.
8
Contrast thresholds and fixation disparity during 5-Hz sinusoidal single- and dual-axis (vertical and lateral) whole-body vibration.5赫兹正弦单轴和双轴(垂直和横向)全身振动期间的对比度阈值和注视视差
Ergonomics. 2000 Mar;43(3):317-32. doi: 10.1080/001401300184431.
9
Influence of back support conditions on the apparent mass of seated occupants under horizontal vibration.水平振动下背部支撑条件对坐姿乘员表观质量的影响。
Ind Health. 2005 Jul;43(3):421-35. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.43.421.
10
The vibration discomfort of standing people: evaluation of multi-axis vibration.站立人群的振动不适感:多轴振动评估
Ergonomics. 2015;58(10):1647-59. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1035761. Epub 2015 May 12.