• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

振动和机械冲击引起的不适的频率依赖性。

Frequency-dependence of discomfort caused by vibration and mechanical shocks.

作者信息

Patelli Giulia, Morioka Miyuki, Griffin Michael J

机构信息

a Human Factors Research Unit, Institute of Sound and Vibration Research , University of Southampton , Southampton , England.

出版信息

Ergonomics. 2018 Aug;61(8):1102-1115. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1429674. Epub 2018 Jan 29.

DOI:10.1080/00140139.2018.1429674
PMID:29338638
Abstract

The frequency content of a mechanical shock is not confined to its fundamental frequency, so it was hypothesised that the frequency-dependence of discomfort caused by shocks with defined fundamental frequencies will differ from the frequency-dependence of sinusoidal vibration. Subjects experienced vertical vibration and vertical shocks with fundamental frequencies from 0.5 to 16 Hz and magnitudes from ±0.7 to ±9.5 ms. The rate of growth of discomfort with increasing magnitude of motion decreased with increasing frequency of both motions, so the frequency-dependence of discomfort varied with the magnitudes of both motions and no single frequency weighting will be ideal for all magnitudes. At the frequencies of sinusoidal vibration producing greatest discomfort (4-16 Hz), shocks produced less discomfort than vibration with same peak acceleration or unweighted vibration dose value. Frequency-weighted vibration dose values provided the best predictions of the discomfort caused by different frequencies and magnitudes of vibration and shock. Practitioner Summary: Human responses to vibration and shock vary according to the frequency content of the motion. The ideal frequency weighting depends on the magnitude of the motion. Standardised frequency-weighted vibration dose values estimate discomfort caused by vibration and shock but for motions containing very low frequencies the filtering is not optimum.

摘要

机械冲击的频率成分并不局限于其基频,因此有人推测,具有特定基频的冲击所引起的不适感的频率依赖性将不同于正弦振动的频率依赖性。受试者体验了基频从0.5至16赫兹、幅值从±0.7至±9.5毫秒的垂直振动和垂直冲击。随着两种运动频率的增加,不适感随运动幅值增加的增长速率降低,因此不适感的频率依赖性随两种运动的幅值而变化,不存在对所有幅值都理想的单一频率加权。在产生最大不适感的正弦振动频率(4 - 16赫兹)下,与具有相同峰值加速度的振动或未加权振动剂量值相比,冲击产生的不适感更小。频率加权振动剂量值能最好地预测不同频率和幅值的振动及冲击所引起的不适感。从业者总结:人体对振动和冲击的反应因运动的频率成分而异。理想的频率加权取决于运动的幅值。标准化的频率加权振动剂量值可估计振动和冲击所引起的不适感,但对于包含极低频率的运动,滤波并非最佳。

相似文献

1
Frequency-dependence of discomfort caused by vibration and mechanical shocks.振动和机械冲击引起的不适的频率依赖性。
Ergonomics. 2018 Aug;61(8):1102-1115. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1429674. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
2
Response of the seated human body to whole-body vertical vibration: discomfort caused by mechanical shocks.坐姿人体对全身垂直振动的响应:机械冲击引起的不适。
Ergonomics. 2017 Mar;60(3):347-357. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2016.1164902. Epub 2016 May 2.
3
Response of the seated human body to whole-body vertical vibration: discomfort caused by sinusoidal vibration.坐姿人体对全身垂直振动的响应:正弦振动引起的不适
Ergonomics. 2014;57(5):714-32. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2014.898799. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
4
Response of the seated human body to whole-body vertical vibration: biodynamic responses to mechanical shocks.坐姿人体对全身垂直振动的响应:对机械冲击的生物动力学响应。
Ergonomics. 2017 Mar;60(3):333-346. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2016.1179793. Epub 2016 May 20.
5
Subjective discomfort caused by vertical whole-body vibration in the frequency range 2-100 Hz.2-100Hz 频率范围内垂直全身振动引起的主观不适。
Ergonomics. 2019 Mar;62(3):420-430. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1533145. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
6
Effect of reclining a seat on the discomfort from vibration and shock on fast boats.座椅倾斜对高速船振动和冲击引起的不适感的影响。
Ergonomics. 2015;58(7):1151-61. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2014.961970. Epub 2014 Oct 17.
7
Effect of phase on discomfort caused by vertical whole-body vibration and shock--experimental investigation.相位对垂直全身振动和冲击所引起不适的影响——实验研究
J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Mar;111(3):1280-8. doi: 10.1121/1.1446051.
8
The vibration discomfort of standing persons: evaluation of random and transient motions.站立者的振动不适:随机和瞬态运动的评估。
Ergonomics. 2011 Dec;54(12):1228-39. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2011.624199.
9
Subjective discomfort analysis of human body in semi-supine posture caused by vertical sinusoidal vibration.人体处于半仰卧姿势时垂直正弦振动引起的主观不适分析。
Ergonomics. 2021 Jun;64(6):744-754. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2020.1865575. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
10
Equivalent comfort contours for fore-and-aft, lateral, and vertical whole-body vibration in the frequency range 1.0 to 10 Hz.1.0至10赫兹频率范围内前后、横向和垂直全身振动的等效舒适度等值线。
Ergonomics. 2018 Nov;61(11):1545-1559. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1517900. Epub 2018 Nov 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Method for Assessing Numbness and Discomfort in Cyclists' Hands.评估自行车骑行者手部麻木与不适的方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Jul 30;25(15):4708. doi: 10.3390/s25154708.
2
Test and evaluation of driving comfort of rice combine harvester.水稻联合收割机驾驶舒适性的试验与评价。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 14;18(6):e0287138. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287138. eCollection 2023.