Kurz L C, Drysdale G, Riley M, Tomar M A, Chen J, Russell R J, Danson M J
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Division of Biology and Biomedical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.
Biochemistry. 2000 Mar 7;39(9):2283-96. doi: 10.1021/bi991982r.
The kinetics and mechanism of the citrate synthase from a moderate thermophile, Thermoplasma acidophilum (TpCS), are compared with those of the citrate synthase from a mesophile, pig heart (PCS). All discrete steps in the mechanistic sequence of PCS can be identified in TpCS. The catalytic strategies identified in PCS, destabilization of the oxaloacetate substrate carbonyl and stabilization of the reactive species, acetyl-CoA enolate, are present in TpCS. Conformational changes, which allow the enzyme to efficiently catalyze both condensation of acetyl-CoA thioester and subsequently hydrolysis of citryl-CoA thioester within the same active site, occur in both enzymes. However, significant differences exist between the two enzymes. PCS is a characteristically efficient enzyme: no internal step is clearly rate-limiting and the condensation step is readily reversible. TpCS is a less efficient catalyst. Over a broad temperature range, inadequate stabilization of the transition state for citryl-CoA hydrolysis renders this step nearly rate-limiting for the forward reaction of TpCS. Further, excessive stabilization of the citryl-CoA intermediate renders the condensation step nearly irreversible. Values of substrate and solvent deuterium isotope effects are consistent with the kinetic model. Near its temperature optimum (70 degrees C), there is a modest increase in the reversibility of the condensation step for TpCS, but reversibility still falls short of that shown by PCS at 37 degrees C. The root cause of the catalytic inefficiency of TpCS may lie in the lack of protein flexibility imposed by the requirement for thermal stability of the protein itself or its temperature-labile substrate, oxaloacetate.
将嗜温菌嗜酸热原体(TpCS)的柠檬酸合酶的动力学和机制与嗜温菌猪心脏的柠檬酸合酶(PCS)的动力学和机制进行了比较。PCS机制序列中的所有离散步骤都可以在TpCS中找到。在PCS中确定的催化策略,即草酰乙酸底物羰基的去稳定化和反应性物种乙酰辅酶A烯醇化物的稳定化,在TpCS中也存在。两种酶都发生了构象变化,这种变化使酶能够在同一活性位点高效催化乙酰辅酶A硫酯的缩合以及随后柠檬酸辅酶A硫酯的水解。然而,这两种酶之间存在显著差异。PCS是一种典型的高效酶:没有内部步骤明显限制速率,缩合步骤很容易可逆。TpCS是一种效率较低的催化剂。在很宽的温度范围内,柠檬酸辅酶A水解过渡态的稳定不足使得该步骤几乎限制了TpCS正向反应的速率。此外,柠檬酸辅酶A中间体的过度稳定使得缩合步骤几乎不可逆。底物和溶剂氘同位素效应的值与动力学模型一致。在其最适温度(70℃)附近,TpCS缩合步骤的可逆性有适度增加,但可逆性仍低于37℃时PCS的可逆性。TpCS催化效率低下的根本原因可能在于蛋白质本身或其温度不稳定的底物草酰乙酸对热稳定性的要求导致蛋白质缺乏灵活性。