Robbins A S, Whittemore A S, Thom D H
Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA, USA.
Am J Epidemiol. 2000 Feb 15;151(4):409-16. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010221.
After diagnosis with prostate cancer, Black men in the United States have poorer survival than White men, even after controlling for differences in cancer stage. The extent to which these racial survival differences are due to biologic versus non-biologic factors is unclear, and it has been hypothesized that differences associated with socioeconomic status (SES) might account for much of the observed survival difference. The authors examined this hypothesis in a cohort study, using cancer registry and US Census data for White and Black men with incident prostate cancer (n = 23,334) who resided in 1,005 census tracts in the San Francisco Bay Area during 1973-1993. Separate analyses were conducted using two endpoints: death from prostate cancer and death from other causes. For each endpoint, death rate ratios (Blacks vs. Whites) were computed for men diagnosed at ages <65 years and at ages > or =65 years. These data suggest that differences associated with SES do not explain why Black men die from prostate cancer at a higher rate when compared with White men with this condition. However, among men with prostate cancer, SES-associated differences appear to explain almost all of the racial difference in risk of death from other causes.
在美国,被诊断出患有前列腺癌后,黑人男性的生存率低于白人男性,即便在对癌症分期差异进行控制之后仍是如此。这些种族生存差异在多大程度上归因于生物学因素与非生物学因素尚不清楚,并且有人提出,与社会经济地位(SES)相关的差异可能是观察到的生存差异的主要原因。作者在一项队列研究中检验了这一假设,使用了癌症登记数据以及美国人口普查数据,这些数据来自1973年至1993年期间居住在旧金山湾区1005个人口普查区的患有前列腺癌的白人男性和黑人男性(n = 23334)。使用两个终点进行了单独分析:前列腺癌死亡和其他原因导致的死亡。对于每个终点,计算了年龄<65岁和年龄≥65岁时被诊断出的男性的死亡率比(黑人与白人)。这些数据表明,与SES相关的差异并不能解释为什么与患有这种疾病的白人男性相比,黑人男性死于前列腺癌的比率更高。然而,在患有前列腺癌的男性中,与SES相关的差异似乎几乎解释了其他原因导致的死亡风险方面的所有种族差异。