The value of postlumpectomy mammogram in the management of breast cancer patients presenting with suspiciouis microcalcifications.

PURPOSE

It is recommended that patients with breast cancer who present with mammographically detected microcalcification should undergo postlumpectomy mammogram with magnification views to ensure adequate removal of all clinically demonstrable disease. The value of postlumpectomy mammogram has not been adequately examined in the literature. This report aims to quantify the value of such a study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective review identified 90 breast cancer patients referred to our department between 1992 and 1997 who met all of the following criteria: (1) patients were considered for breast conserving management; (2) patients had suspicious microcalcifications on diagnostic mammograms; (3) the mammographic lesions were thought to be removed entirely on postexcision specimen radiographs; (4) surgical excisions were thought to be adequate on the basis of a review of the histologic pathology reports; and (5) postlumpectomy mammograms with magnification views were obtained. Fifty patients had invasive adenocarcinoma and 40 patients had ductal carcinoma in situ. The margins of last resection were clear, close, or focally involved in 70, 13, and seven patients, respectively. Patient records were reviewed to determine whether postlumpectomy mammograms demonstrated residual microcalcifications.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients (17%) were found to have residual microcalcifications on postlumpectomy mammograms. Twelve patients underwent either local re-excision (seven patients) or simple mastectomy (five patients). Re-excision was not performed in four patients. Residual malignant cells were found in eight patients (67% of the re-excision group and 9% of the whole group). Six of these patients had their tumors initially resected with clear margins and the remaining two patients had their tumors initially resected with close margins.

CONCLUSIONS

Postlumpectomy mammograms with magnification views detected residual clinical disease in a significant proportion of patients. Our result supports the routine use of this test, even when satisfactory postexcision specimen radiographs and adequate lumpectomy resection margins are obtained. This finding is particularly true for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ.