Chan Y S, Ueng S W, Wang C J, Lee S S, Chen C Y, Shin C H
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China.
J Trauma. 2000 Feb;48(2):246-55. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200002000-00009.
Bone grafting plays an important role in reconstructing infected tibial nonunions. The effects of antibiotic-impregnated bone grafting in infection elimination and bone incorporation was reported in this retrospective study.
Ninety-six patients treated for infected tibial nonunions were evaluated. These patients were managed with local antibiotic bead therapy and staged antibiotic-impregnated autogenous cancellous bone graft or pure autogenous cancellous bone graft. Patients were randomized to antibiotic-impregnated bone grafting or bone grafting-only groups on the basis of whether the admission date was odd or even. Patients were divided into two groups (antibiotic-impregnated bone grafting group and pure cancellous bone grafting group), according to the procedure used in preparing the bone grafts. The antibiotic-impregnated bone grafting group included 37 men and 9 women whose average age was 36 years (range, 17 to 72 years). The average follow-up period was 4.8 years. By using the Cierny-Mader staging classification of chronic osteomyelitis, 32 of 46 patients (70%) were stage 4A, and 14 of 36 patients (30%) were stage 4B. The pure cancellous bone grafting group included 39 men and 11 women whose average age was 37 years (range, 18 to 72 years). The average follow-up period was 4.5 years (range, 4 to 6 years). Thirty-nine of 50 patients (78%) were stage 4A, and 11 of 50 patients (22%) were stage 4B. The bone defects in both groups ranged from 2 to 4 cm.
Wound healing and bony union were achieved in the antibiotic-impregnated bone grafting group. Only two patients had recurrent infections. The infection arrest rate was 95.6%. However, 9 of 50 patients in the pure cancellous bone grafting group had recurrent infections. The infection arrest rate was 82%. The antibiotic-impregnated bone grafting group had significantly superior results (95.6% vs. 82% chi2 test, p < 0.05) in infection elimination than the pure cancellous bone grafting group.
After 4 to 6 years of follow-up, our results suggest that the use of impregnating antibiotics have no adverse effects on autogenic cancellous bone graft incorporation and could help to eliminate infection effectively.
骨移植在重建感染性胫骨骨不连中起着重要作用。本回顾性研究报告了抗生素浸渍骨移植在消除感染和促进骨融合方面的效果。
对96例接受感染性胫骨骨不连治疗的患者进行评估。这些患者接受了局部抗生素珠治疗,并分期进行抗生素浸渍自体松质骨移植或单纯自体松质骨移植。根据入院日期是奇数还是偶数,将患者随机分为抗生素浸渍骨移植组或单纯骨移植组。根据制备骨移植的方法,将患者分为两组(抗生素浸渍骨移植组和单纯松质骨移植组)。抗生素浸渍骨移植组包括37名男性和9名女性,平均年龄36岁(范围17至72岁)。平均随访期为4.8年。根据慢性骨髓炎的Cierny-Mader分期分类,46例患者中的32例(70%)为4A期,36例患者中的14例(30%)为$4B$期。单纯松质骨移植组包括39名男性和11名女性,平均年龄37岁(范围18至72岁)。平均随访期为4.5年(范围4至6年)。50例患者中的$39$例(78%)为4A期,5例患者中的11例(22%)为4B期。两组的骨缺损范围为2至4厘米。
抗生素浸渍骨移植组实现了伤口愈合和骨愈合。只有两名患者出现复发性感染。感染控制率为95.6%。然而,单纯松质骨移植组的50例患者中有9例出现复发性感染。感染控制率为82%。抗生素浸渍骨移植组在消除感染方面的结果(95.6%对82%,卡方检验,p<0.05)明显优于单纯松质骨移植组。
经过4至6年的随访,我们的结果表明,使用浸渍抗生素对自体松质骨移植融合没有不良影响,并且可以有效地帮助消除感染。