De Groote D, Ducatelle R, van Doorn L J, Tilmant K, Verschuuren A, Haesebrouck F
Department of Pathology, Bacteriology and Avian Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Ghent, B-9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.
J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Mar;38(3):1131-5. doi: 10.1128/JCM.38.3.1131-1135.2000.
Recently, a new 16S ribosomal DNA-based PCR assay was developed for the specific detection of "Candidatus Helicobacter suis" (former "Gastrospirillum suis") in porcine gastric samples. In the present study, this PCR assay was compared to three other invasive diagnostic methods (rapid urease test, immunohistochemistry, histologic analysis by Giemsa staining). Antral stomach samples from 200 slaughterhouse pigs from Belgium and The Netherlands were examined. Bacterial presence was determined in 77% (154 of 200) of the samples by PCR in combination with Southern blot hybridization, 56% (111 of 200) of the samples by immunohistochemistry, 61% (122 of 200) of the samples by urease testing (20 h postinoculation [p.i.]), 36% (71 of 200) of the samples by urease testing (3 h p.i.), and 33% (65 of 200) of the samples by Giemsa staining. The intrinsic specificity of the PCR assay was assessed by Southern blot analysis with an "Candidatus H. suis"-specific probe and sequencing of PCR products. Interassay sensitivity and specificity values were assessed for each test by pairwise comparisons between tests. Agreement between tests was evaluated by calculating Cohen's kappa coefficient. From that analysis, the PCR assay was considered the most reliable benchmark. Microscopic detection of immunohistochemically labeled or Giemsa-stained "Candidatus H. suis" cells in stomach sections proved to be highly specific (100%) but relatively insensitive (72 and 42%, respectively) compared to the PCR assay. A longer incubation time of the urease test improved its sensitivity considerably (74 versus 55%) but was accompanied by a loss of specificity (72 versus 93%). In conclusion, we found the "Candidatus H. suis"-specific PCR assay to be a sensitive and reliable diagnostic method for the detection of "Candidatus H. suis" in the stomachs of pigs and could prove to be a valuable tool for further epidemiological studies both for "Candidatus H. suis"- and for "Helicobacter heilmannii" type 1-related research.
最近,开发了一种基于16S核糖体DNA的新型PCR检测方法,用于特异性检测猪胃样本中的“猪源假幽门螺杆菌”(原“猪胃螺菌”)。在本研究中,将该PCR检测方法与其他三种侵入性诊断方法(快速尿素酶试验、免疫组织化学、吉姆萨染色组织学分析)进行了比较。对来自比利时和荷兰的200头屠宰场猪的胃窦样本进行了检测。通过PCR结合Southern印迹杂交,在77%(200份样本中的154份)的样本中检测到细菌存在;通过免疫组织化学在56%(200份样本中的111份)的样本中检测到细菌存在;通过尿素酶试验(接种后20小时)在61%(200份样本中的122份)的样本中检测到细菌存在;通过尿素酶试验(接种后3小时)在36%(200份样本中的71份)的样本中检测到细菌存在;通过吉姆萨染色在33%(200份样本中的65份)的样本中检测到细菌存在。通过使用“猪源假幽门螺杆菌”特异性探针的Southern印迹分析和PCR产物测序评估了PCR检测方法的内在特异性。通过各检测方法之间的成对比较评估了每种检测方法的批间敏感性和特异性值。通过计算科恩kappa系数评估了各检测方法之间的一致性。从该分析中,PCR检测方法被认为是最可靠的基准。与PCR检测方法相比,在胃切片中对免疫组织化学标记或吉姆萨染色的“猪源假幽门螺杆菌”细胞进行显微镜检测被证明具有高度特异性(100%),但相对不敏感(分别为72%和42%)。尿素酶试验延长孵育时间可显著提高其敏感性(74%对55%),但会伴随着特异性的降低(72%对93%)。总之,我们发现“猪源假幽门螺杆菌”特异性PCR检测方法是一种用于检测猪胃中“猪源假幽门螺杆菌”的灵敏且可靠的诊断方法,并且可能被证明是用于“猪源假幽门螺杆菌”以及与1型“海氏螺杆菌”相关研究的进一步流行病学研究的有价值工具。