Hilgetag C C, O'Neill M A, Young M P
Department of Psychology, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2000 Jan 29;355(1393):71-89. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2000.0550.
Neuroanatomists have described a large number of connections between the various structures of monkey and cat cortical sensory systems. Because of the complexity of the connection data, analysis is required to unravel what principles of organization they imply. To date, analysis of laminar origin and termination connection data to reveal hierarchical relationships between the cortical areas has been the most widely acknowledged approach. We programmed a network processor that searches for optimal hierarchical orderings of cortical areas given known hierarchical constraints and rules for their interpretation. For all cortical systems and all cost functions, the processor found a multitude of equally low-cost hierarchies. Laminar hierarchical constraints that are presently available in the anatomical literature were therefore insufficient to constrain a unique ordering for any of the sensory systems we analysed. Hierarchical orderings of the monkey visual system that have been widely reported, but which were derived by hand, were not among the optimal orderings. All the cortical systems we studied displayed a significant degree of hierarchical organization, and the anatomical constraints from the monkey visual and somato-motor systems were satisfied with very few constraint violations in the optimal hierarchies. The visual and somato-motor systems in that animal were therefore surprisingly strictly hierarchical. Most inconsistencies between the constraints and the hierarchical relationships in the optimal structures for the visual system were related to connections of area FST (fundus of superior temporal sulcus). We found that the hierarchical solutions could be further improved by assuming that FST consists of two areas, which differ in the nature of their projections. Indeed, we found that perfect hierarchical arrangements of the primate visual system, without any violation of anatomical constraints, could be obtained under two reasonable conditions, namely the subdivision of FST into two distinct areas, whose connectivity we predict, and the abolition of at least one of the less reliable rule constraints. Our analyses showed that the future collection of the same type of laminar constraints, or the inclusion of new hierarchical constraints from thalamocortical connections, will not resolve the problem of multiple optimal hierarchical representations for the primate visual system. Further data, however, may help to specify the relative ordering of some more areas. This indeterminacy of the visual hierarchy is in part due to the reported absence of some connections between cortical areas. These absences are consistent with limited cross-talk between differentiated processing streams in the system. Hence, hierarchical representation of the visual system is affected by, and must take into account, other organizational features, such as processing streams.
神经解剖学家已经描述了猴子和猫皮质感觉系统的各种结构之间大量的连接。由于连接数据的复杂性,需要进行分析以揭示它们所隐含的组织原则。迄今为止,分析层状起源和终止连接数据以揭示皮质区域之间的层级关系是最广泛认可的方法。我们编写了一个网络处理器,该处理器在给定已知层级约束及其解释规则的情况下,搜索皮质区域的最优层级排序。对于所有皮质系统和所有成本函数,该处理器都找到了大量成本同样低的层级结构。因此,解剖学文献中目前可用的层状层级约束不足以约束我们分析的任何一个感觉系统的唯一排序。广泛报道的但通过人工推导得出的猴子视觉系统的层级排序并不在最优排序之中。我们研究的所有皮质系统都显示出显著程度的层级组织,并且猴子视觉和躯体运动系统的解剖学约束在最优层级结构中只有很少的约束违反情况得到满足。因此,该动物的视觉和躯体运动系统令人惊讶地严格分层。视觉系统最优结构中约束与层级关系之间的大多数不一致与颞上沟底部区域(FST)的连接有关。我们发现,通过假设FST由两个区域组成,这两个区域在其投射性质上有所不同,可以进一步改进层级解决方案。实际上,我们发现,在两个合理条件下,即把FST细分为两个不同区域(我们预测了它们的连接性)以及废除至少一个不太可靠的规则约束,可以得到灵长类视觉系统完美的层级排列,且不违反任何解剖学约束。我们的分析表明,未来收集相同类型的层状约束,或者纳入来自丘脑皮质连接的新的层级约束,都无法解决灵长类视觉系统多个最优层级表示的问题。然而,进一步的数据可能有助于确定更多区域的相对排序。视觉层级的这种不确定性部分是由于据报道皮质区域之间缺少一些连接。这些缺失与系统中分化的处理流之间有限的串扰是一致的。因此,视觉系统的层级表示受到其他组织特征(如处理流)的影响,并且必须考虑这些特征。