Burkhart S S, Wirth M A, Simonich M, Salem D, Lanctot D, Athanasiou K
San Antonio Orthopaedic Group, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, TX, USA.
Arthroscopy. 2000 Mar;16(2):202-7. doi: 10.1016/s0749-8063(00)90037-9.
We sought to determine which simple sliding knot configurations would have adequate strength for rotator cuff repair. Four knot configurations were tied with both No. 1 polydioxanone suture and No. 2 Ethibond suture (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ) using 3 different tying techniques: hand-tie, standard knot pusher, and cannulated double-diameter knot pusher. The knots were then tested to failure on a materials testing system. The weakest standard knot configuration was S=S=S=S. The other 3 knot configurations (S//S//S//S, SxSxSxS, and S//xS//xS//xS) generally failed in the 35 to 50 N range. Ultimate strength in this range can be shown to be adequate to withstand, without suture failure, a maximal contraction of a repaired rotator cuff tear within the rotator crescent, assuming certain conditions are met (suture anchors placed 1 cm apart, 2 sutures per anchor). More complex knots are not necessary for adequate knot security. However, the same configuration with only 1 suture per anchor will not be strong enough because the suture will fail under maximum physiological load. This study shows that we can predict the adequacy of a given knot configuration under maximum physiological loading conditions.
我们试图确定哪些简单的滑结构型对于肩袖修复具有足够的强度。使用3种不同的打结技术,分别用1号聚二氧六环酮缝线和2号Ethibond缝线(Ethicon公司,新泽西州萨默维尔)打出4种结构型:手工打结、标准打结器打结和空心双直径打结器打结。然后在材料测试系统上对这些结进行直至断裂的测试。最弱的标准结构型是S=S=S=S。其他3种结构型(S//S//S//S、SxSxSxS和S//xS//xS//xS)通常在35至50牛的范围内断裂。在满足某些条件(缝线锚钉相距1厘米,每个锚钉2根缝线)的情况下,该范围内的极限强度足以承受肩袖月牙区内修复的肩袖撕裂的最大收缩而不发生缝线断裂。对于足够的结安全性而言,不需要更复杂的结。然而,每个锚钉仅1根缝线的相同构型强度不够,因为缝线在最大生理负荷下会断裂。本研究表明,我们可以预测在最大生理负荷条件下给定结构型的适用性。