Wu Shen-Han, Yeh Tsu-Te, Hsu Wei-Chun, Wu Alexander T H, Li Guoan, Chen Chih-Hwa, Lee Chian-Her, Wu Jia-Lin
Department of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Department of Orthopedics, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
J Orthop Translat. 2020 Feb 17;24:144-149. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2020.01.006. eCollection 2020 Sep.
This study hypothesized that the suture anchor of tibial fixation method of PMMR repair technique is the main factor which reduce the gap formation or over displacement of tear site in initial healing, and then investigated the fixation stability of 4 different tibial fixations through cyclic and ultimate failure load testing of meniscal root sutures.
Twenty-four porcine tibiae with intact medial meniscus roots were randomly assigned into 4 groups: transosseous suture, washer, suture anchor, or screw with washer. Each sample underwent cyclic loading followed by a load-to-failure test. Displacement, maximum load to failure, stiffness, and elongation at failure load were recorded.
The maximum average load and displacement at failure for each of the repair groups were as follows: transosseous suture, 232.8 N and 12.16 mm; washer, 189.9 N and 21.5 mm; suture anchor, 140.6 N and 13.8 mm; and screw with washer, 167.9 N and 18.9 mm. The maximum stiffness values for each of the repair groups were as follows: transosseous suture, 19.5 ± 0.7 N/mm; washer, 21.5 ± 1.4 N/mm; suture anchor, 13.8 ± 0.7 N/mm; and screw with washer, 18.9 ± 3.9 N/mm. The mean elongation across the repairs for each of the repair groups after 1000 loading cycles was: transosseous suture, 3.74 ± 0.28 mm; washer, 3.04 ± 0.13 mm; suture anchor, 2.25 ± 0.33 mm; and screw with washer, 2.43 ± 0.19 mm. The mean elongation was significantly less with the suture anchor than with the other techniques ( < .05).
Under physiological loading, our results indicate that a slower rehabilitation program with limited flexion and only partial weight bearing is advised when using a suture anchor because of the lower maximum load and stiffness.
Tibial fixation using a washer or a screw with a washer is an effective and cost-saving technique when an option is required with high stiffness and low displacement at failure.
本研究假设半月板根部修复(PMMR)技术中胫骨固定方法的缝合锚是减少初始愈合过程中撕裂部位间隙形成或过度移位的主要因素,然后通过半月板根部缝线的循环和极限破坏载荷测试研究4种不同胫骨固定方式的固定稳定性。
将24个内侧半月板根部完整的猪胫骨随机分为4组:经骨缝合、垫圈、缝合锚或带垫圈螺钉。每个样本先进行循环加载,然后进行破坏载荷测试。记录位移、最大破坏载荷、刚度和破坏载荷下的伸长量。
各修复组的最大平均破坏载荷和位移如下:经骨缝合,232.8 N和12.16 mm;垫圈,189.9 N和21.5 mm;缝合锚,140.6 N和13.8 mm;带垫圈螺钉,167.9 N和18.9 mm。各修复组的最大刚度值如下:经骨缝合,19.5±0.7 N/mm;垫圈,21.5±1.4 N/mm;缝合锚,13.8±0.7 N/mm;带垫圈螺钉,18.9±3.9 N/mm。1000次加载循环后,各修复组修复部位的平均伸长量为:经骨缝合,3.74±0.28 mm;垫圈,3.04±0.13 mm;缝合锚,2.25±0. .33 mm;带垫圈螺钉,2.43±0.19 mm。缝合锚的平均伸长量显著低于其他技术(P<0.05)。
在生理载荷下,我们的结果表明,由于最大载荷和刚度较低,使用缝合锚时建议采用有限屈伸和部分负重的较慢康复方案。
当需要一种在破坏时具有高刚度和低位移的选择时,使用垫圈或带垫圈螺钉进行胫骨固定是一种有效且节省成本的技术。