Baquet C R, Commiskey P
Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, USA.
Cancer. 2000 Mar 1;88(5 Suppl):1256-64. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(20000301)88:5+<1256::aid-cncr13>3.0.co;2-3.
Breast carcinoma is the most common cancer in women in the U.S. and the second leading cause of cancer death in women. Furthermore, there are racial differences in breast carcinoma incidence, mortality, and survival rates. Social and economic factors within racial/ethnic groups are being examined as risk factors not only for breast carcinoma mortality and survival but also as determinants of the rate of incidence. Social and economic factors have been associated in the literature predominantly with cancer mortality and survival. When socioeconomic status (SES) is considered, certain studies suggest that racial disparities in breast carcinoma are smaller than when social and economic factors are examined alone, but these disparities still persist. Sources of data for this discussion include the National Cancer Institute (NCI) (the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results [SEER] program, a group of population-based cancer registries that cover up to 14% of the U.S. population. SEER reports cancer incidence, mortality, and survival rates), the U.S. Bureau of the Census, the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), and numerous articles from the scientific literature. Socioeconomic factors or SES can be considered "cross-cutting risk factors" (i.e., they can be related to the risk of developing breast carcinoma [rate of incidence] as well as to the risk of dying [mortality] from this disease). They also are the risk factors that "cut across" racial and ethnic populations. Socioeconomic factors are related to breast carcinoma mortality and survival rates in multicultural women. Racial disparities in breast carcinoma mortality and survival rates can be explained partially by stage distribution at the time of diagnosis, which may be related to SES. For example, African-American women present with more advanced stage distributions for breast carcinoma than white women. Similarly, women of lower SES present with higher stage disease than women of upper SES who present with more localized breast carcinoma. The lack of data regarding the SES of cancer patients limits our understanding of the contributions of SES to cancer incidence and mortality rates. SES appears to be related to breast carcinoma incidence, mortality, and survival rates. Breast carcinoma mortality is higher in women of lower SES. Additional research on SES, race, culture, and the relation of these factors to cancer incidence rate is needed.
乳腺癌是美国女性中最常见的癌症,也是女性癌症死亡的第二大主要原因。此外,乳腺癌的发病率、死亡率和生存率存在种族差异。种族/族裔群体中的社会和经济因素正在被视为不仅是乳腺癌死亡率和生存率的风险因素,也是发病率的决定因素。社会和经济因素在文献中主要与癌症死亡率和生存率相关。当考虑社会经济地位(SES)时,某些研究表明,乳腺癌的种族差异比单独研究社会和经济因素时要小,但这些差异仍然存在。本次讨论的数据来源包括美国国家癌症研究所(NCI)(监测、流行病学和最终结果[SEER]计划,这是一组基于人群的癌症登记处,覆盖了美国高达14%的人口。SEER报告癌症发病率、死亡率和生存率)、美国人口普查局、国家卫生统计中心(NCHS)以及科学文献中的众多文章。社会经济因素或SES可被视为“交叉风险因素”(即,它们可能与患乳腺癌的风险[发病率]以及死于这种疾病的风险[死亡率]相关)。它们也是“贯穿”种族和族裔人群的风险因素。社会经济因素与多文化女性的乳腺癌死亡率和生存率相关。乳腺癌死亡率和生存率的种族差异部分可以通过诊断时的分期分布来解释,这可能与SES有关。例如,非裔美国女性乳腺癌的分期分布比白人女性更晚。同样,社会经济地位较低的女性所患疾病的分期比社会经济地位较高的女性更高,后者所患乳腺癌更局限。缺乏关于癌症患者社会经济地位的数据限制了我们对社会经济地位对癌症发病率和死亡率贡献的理解。社会经济地位似乎与乳腺癌的发病率、死亡率和生存率相关。社会经济地位较低的女性乳腺癌死亡率更高。需要对社会经济地位、种族、文化以及这些因素与癌症发病率的关系进行更多研究。