• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会经济地位对癌症发病率及诊断时分期的影响:来自监测、流行病学及最终结果:国家纵向死亡率研究的选定发现

Impact of socioeconomic status on cancer incidence and stage at diagnosis: selected findings from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results: National Longitudinal Mortality Study.

作者信息

Clegg Limin X, Reichman Marsha E, Miller Barry A, Hankey Benjamin F, Singh Gopal K, Lin Yi Dan, Goodman Marc T, Lynch Charles F, Schwartz Stephen M, Chen Vivien W, Bernstein Leslie, Gomez Scarlett L, Graff John J, Lin Charles C, Johnson Norman J, Edwards Brenda K

机构信息

Office of Healthcare Inspections, Office of Inspector General (54AA), U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20420, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Causes Control. 2009 May;20(4):417-35. doi: 10.1007/s10552-008-9256-0. Epub 2008 Nov 12.

DOI:10.1007/s10552-008-9256-0
PMID:19002764
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2711979/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Population-based cancer registry data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) are mainly based on medical records and administrative information. Individual-level socioeconomic data are not routinely reported by cancer registries in the United States because they are not available in patient hospital records. The U.S. representative National Longitudinal Mortality Study (NLMS) data provide self-reported, detailed demographic and socioeconomic data from the Social and Economic Supplement to the Census Bureau's Current Population Survey (CPS). In 1999, the NCI initiated the SEER-NLMS study, linking the population-based SEER cancer registry data to NLMS data. The SEER-NLMS data provide a new unique research resource that is valuable for health disparity research on cancer burden. We describe the design, methods, and limitations of this data set. We also present findings on cancer-related health disparities according to individual-level socioeconomic status (SES) and demographic characteristics for all cancers combined and for cancers of the lung, breast, prostate, cervix, and melanoma.

METHODS

Records of cancer patients diagnosed in 1973-2001 when residing 1 of 11 SEER registries were linked with 26 NLMS cohorts. The total number of SEER matched cancer patients that were also members of an NLMS cohort was 26,844. Of these 26,844 matched patients, 11,464 were included in the incidence analyses and 15,357 in the late-stage diagnosis analyses. Matched patients (used in the incidence analyses) and unmatched patients were compared by age group, sex, race, ethnicity, residence area, year of diagnosis, and cancer anatomic site. Cohort-based age-adjusted cancer incidence rates were computed. The impact of socioeconomic status on cancer incidence and stage of diagnosis was evaluated.

RESULTS

Men and women with less than a high school education had elevated lung cancer rate ratios of 3.01 and 2.02, respectively, relative to their college educated counterparts. Those with family annual incomes less than $12,500 had incidence rates that were more than 1.7 times the lung cancer incidence rate of those with incomes $50,000 or higher. Lower income was also associated with a statistically significantly increased risk of distant-stage breast cancer among women and distant-stage prostate cancer among men.

CONCLUSIONS

Socioeconomic patterns in incidence varied for specific cancers, while such patterns for stage were generally consistent across cancers, with late-stage diagnoses being associated with lower SES. These findings illustrate the potential for analyzing disparities in cancer outcomes according to a variety of individual-level socioeconomic, demographic, and health care characteristics, as well as by area measures available in the linked database.

摘要

背景

美国国立癌症研究所(NCI)监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)项目基于人群的癌症登记数据主要基于医疗记录和管理信息。美国癌症登记处通常不会报告个体层面的社会经济数据,因为患者医院记录中没有这些数据。具有美国代表性的全国纵向死亡率研究(NLMS)数据提供了来自人口普查局当前人口调查(CPS)社会和经济补充部分的自我报告的详细人口统计学和社会经济数据。1999年,NCI启动了SEER-NLMS研究,将基于人群的SEER癌症登记数据与NLMS数据相链接。SEER-NLMS数据提供了一种全新的独特研究资源,对癌症负担方面的健康差异研究具有重要价值。我们描述了该数据集的设计、方法和局限性。我们还根据个体层面的社会经济地位(SES)以及所有癌症合并以及肺癌、乳腺癌、前列腺癌、宫颈癌和黑色素瘤的人口统计学特征,呈现了与癌症相关的健康差异研究结果。

方法

1973年至2001年期间在11个SEER登记处之一居住时被诊断为癌症的患者记录与26个NLMS队列相链接。同时属于NLMS队列的SEER匹配癌症患者总数为26,844人。在这26,844名匹配患者中,11,464人纳入发病率分析,15,357人纳入晚期诊断分析。对匹配患者(用于发病率分析)和未匹配患者按年龄组、性别、种族、族裔、居住地区、诊断年份和癌症解剖部位进行比较。计算基于队列的年龄调整癌症发病率。评估社会经济地位对癌症发病率和诊断阶段的影响。

结果

与受过大学教育的同龄人相比,受教育程度低于高中的男性和女性肺癌发病率比值分别为3.01和2.02。家庭年收入低于12,500美元的人群的发病率是收入50,000美元或更高人群肺癌发病率的1.7倍以上。低收入还与女性远处期乳腺癌和男性远处期前列腺癌的统计学显著增加风险相关。

结论

特定癌症的发病率社会经济模式各不相同,而各癌症阶段的此类模式总体上较为一致,晚期诊断与较低的社会经济地位相关。这些发现表明,根据各种个体层面的社会经济、人口统计学和医疗保健特征以及链接数据库中可用的地区指标来分析癌症结局差异具有潜力。

相似文献

1
Impact of socioeconomic status on cancer incidence and stage at diagnosis: selected findings from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results: National Longitudinal Mortality Study.社会经济地位对癌症发病率及诊断时分期的影响:来自监测、流行病学及最终结果:国家纵向死亡率研究的选定发现
Cancer Causes Control. 2009 May;20(4):417-35. doi: 10.1007/s10552-008-9256-0. Epub 2008 Nov 12.
2
Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2002, featuring population-based trends in cancer treatment.《1975 - 2002年全国癌症状况年度报告》,重点介绍基于人群的癌症治疗趋势。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Oct 5;97(19):1407-27. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji289.
3
Annual Report to the Nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2010, featuring prevalence of comorbidity and impact on survival among persons with lung, colorectal, breast, or prostate cancer.《1975-2010 年全国癌症报告:肺癌、结直肠癌、乳腺癌和前列腺癌患者合并症的流行情况及其对生存的影响》
Cancer. 2014 May 1;120(9):1290-314. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28509. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
4
Variation in incidence of breast, lung and cervical cancer and malignant melanoma of skin by socioeconomic group in England.英格兰不同社会经济群体中乳腺癌、肺癌、宫颈癌及皮肤恶性黑色素瘤发病率的差异。
BMC Cancer. 2008 Sep 26;8:271. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-8-271.
5
Socioeconomic factors and breast carcinoma in multicultural women.多元文化背景女性中的社会经济因素与乳腺癌
Cancer. 2000 Mar 1;88(5 Suppl):1256-64. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(20000301)88:5+<1256::aid-cncr13>3.0.co;2-3.
6
Surveillance of screening-detected cancers (colon and rectum, breast, and cervix) - United States, 2004-2006.筛查发现癌症(结肠和直肠、乳腺、子宫颈)监测-美国,2004-2006 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2010 Nov 26;59(9):1-25.
7
Evaluating factors associated with unknown SEER Summary Stage 2000 derived from collaborative stage at central registry level.评估与2000年监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)总结分期不明相关的因素,该分期由中央登记处层面的协作分期得出。
J Registry Manag. 2012 Fall;39(3):101-6.
8
A comparison of breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers reported to the National Cancer Data Base and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program.向国家癌症数据库以及监测、流行病学和最终结果计划报告的乳腺癌、结直肠癌、肺癌和前列腺癌的比较。
Cancer. 1997 May 15;79(10):2052-61. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19970515)79:10<2052::aid-cncr29>3.0.co;2-s.
9
Social class, race/ethnicity, and incidence of breast, cervix, colon, lung, and prostate cancer among Asian, Black, Hispanic, and White residents of the San Francisco Bay Area, 1988-92 (United States).1988 - 1992年美国旧金山湾区亚裔、黑人、西班牙裔和白人居民的社会阶层、种族/族裔以及乳腺癌、宫颈癌、结肠癌、肺癌和前列腺癌的发病率
Cancer Causes Control. 1999 Dec;10(6):525-37. doi: 10.1023/a:1008950210967.
10
Neighborhood and Individual Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Survival Among Patients With Nonmetastatic Common Cancers.社区和个体社会经济劣势与非转移性常见癌症患者的生存。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2139593. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.39593.

引用本文的文献

1
Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: evolving practice patterns from the national cancer database (2004-2020).脑转移瘤的立体定向放射外科治疗:来自国家癌症数据库(2004 - 2020年)的实践模式演变
J Neurooncol. 2025 Aug 22. doi: 10.1007/s11060-025-05178-8.
2
Association of Low Educational Attainment and Higher Colorectal Cancer Risk: Mediatory Effect of Lifestyle-Associated Factors Within Local Context.低教育程度与较高结直肠癌风险的关联:当地背景下生活方式相关因素的中介作用
World J Oncol. 2025 Jul 8;16(4):388-396. doi: 10.14740/wjon2599. eCollection 2025 Aug.
3
Associations between social drivers of health and breast cancer stage at diagnosis among U.S. Black women.美国黑人女性健康的社会驱动因素与乳腺癌诊断分期之间的关联。
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2025 Aug 6;11(1):85. doi: 10.1038/s41523-025-00804-0.
4
Educational attainment and employment status in lung cancer patients: a nationwide study.肺癌患者的教育程度和就业状况:一项全国性研究。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2025 Jul 9. doi: 10.1007/s12094-025-03994-y.
5
Association between socioeconomic background and cancer: An ecological study using cancer registry and various community socioeconomic status indicators in Kanagawa, Japan.社会经济背景与癌症之间的关联:一项使用日本神奈川县癌症登记数据及各类社区社会经济状况指标的生态学研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 9;20(7):e0326895. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326895. eCollection 2025.
6
Inter-Country Doctor-to-Doctor Telemedicine Conferences/Consultations Following COVID-19: A Survey of the National University Hospital Council of Japan.新冠疫情后日本国立大学医院理事会的跨国医生对医生远程医疗会议/会诊调查
Telemed Rep. 2025 May 20;6(1):148-161. doi: 10.1089/tmr.2025.0015. eCollection 2025.
7
Occupational Disparities in Cancer Survival Among the Working Population in Japan: 10-Year Survival Analysis Using the Kanagawa Cancer Registry.日本劳动人口癌症生存率的职业差异:基于神奈川癌症登记处的10年生存率分析
Cancer Med. 2025 Jul;14(13):e71020. doi: 10.1002/cam4.71020.
8
Beyond Barriers: Achieving True Equity in Cancer Care.突破障碍:实现癌症护理的真正公平。
Curr Oncol. 2025 Jun 12;32(6):349. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32060349.
9
Research progress and trends in colorectal cancer self-management: a bibliometric analysis from 2004 to 2024.结直肠癌自我管理的研究进展与趋势:2004年至2024年的文献计量分析
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jun 24;33(7):620. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09678-1.
10
Reducing barriers to care in the treatment of lung cancer: a narrative review.降低肺癌治疗中的就医障碍:一项叙述性综述
J Thorac Dis. 2025 May 30;17(5):3410-3418. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2024-1962. Epub 2025 May 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality of race, Hispanic ethnicity, and immigrant status in population-based cancer registry data: implications for health disparity studies.基于人群的癌症登记数据中的种族、西班牙裔族裔和移民身份质量:对健康差异研究的影响。
Cancer Causes Control. 2007 Mar;18(2):177-87. doi: 10.1007/s10552-006-0089-4. Epub 2007 Jan 11.
2
Health behaviors of adults: United States, 1999-2001.成年人的健康行为:美国,1999 - 2001年
Vital Health Stat 10. 2004 Feb(219):1-79.
3
Persistent area socioeconomic disparities in U.S. incidence of cervical cancer, mortality, stage, and survival, 1975-2000.1975 - 2000年美国宫颈癌发病率、死亡率、分期及生存率方面持续存在的地区社会经济差异。
Cancer. 2004 Sep 1;101(5):1051-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20467.
4
Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2001, with a special feature regarding survival.1975 - 2001年美国癌症现状年度报告,附生存情况专题内容
Cancer. 2004 Jul 1;101(1):3-27. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20288.
5
Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States: results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey.美国癌症筛查实践的进展:2000年全国健康访谈调查结果
Cancer. 2003 Mar 15;97(6):1528-40. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11208.
6
Cancer survival among US whites and minorities: a SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) Program population-based study.美国白人和少数族裔的癌症生存率:一项基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)计划人群的研究。
Arch Intern Med. 2002 Sep 23;162(17):1985-93. doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.17.1985.
7
Geocoding and monitoring of US socioeconomic inequalities in mortality and cancer incidence: does the choice of area-based measure and geographic level matter?: the Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project.美国死亡率和癌症发病率的社会经济不平等的地理编码与监测:基于区域的测量方法和地理层级的选择是否重要?:公共卫生差异地理编码项目
Am J Epidemiol. 2002 Sep 1;156(5):471-82. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwf068.
8
Changing area socioeconomic patterns in U.S. cancer mortality, 1950-1998: Part II--Lung and colorectal cancers.1950 - 1998年美国癌症死亡率中地区社会经济模式的变化:第二部分——肺癌和结直肠癌
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002 Jun 19;94(12):916-25. doi: 10.1093/jnci/94.12.916.
9
Changing area socioeconomic patterns in U.S. cancer mortality, 1950-1998: Part I--All cancers among men.1950 - 1998年美国癌症死亡率中地区社会经济模式的变化:第一部分——男性所有癌症
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002 Jun 19;94(12):904-15. doi: 10.1093/jnci/94.12.904.
10
Survival of breast cancer patients in Connecticut in relation to socioeconomic and health care access indicators.康涅狄格州乳腺癌患者的生存情况与社会经济及医疗保健可及性指标的关系。
J Urban Health. 2002 Jun;79(2):211-8. doi: 10.1093/jurban/79.2.211.