Woodin M A, Liu Y, Neuberg D, Hauser R, Smith T J, Christiani D C
Department of Environmental Health (Occupational Health Program), Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Am J Ind Med. 2000 Apr;37(4):353-63. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(200004)37:4<353::aid-ajim5>3.0.co;2-l.
Occupational exposure to fuel-oil ash, with its high vanadium content, may cause respiratory illness. It is unclear, however, what early acute health effects may occur on the pathway from normal to compromised respiratory function.
Using a repeated measures design, we studied prospectively 18 boilermakers overhauling an oil-fired boiler and 11 utility worker controls. Subjects completed a respiratory symptom diary five times per day by using a 0-3 scale where 0=symptom not present, 1=mild symptom, 2=moderate symptom, and 3=severe symptom. Daily symptom severity was calculated by using the highest reported score each day for upper and lower respiratory symptoms. Daily symptom frequency was calculated by summing all upper or lower airway symptom reports, then dividing by number of reporting times. Respiratory symptom frequency and severity were analyzed for dose-response relationships with estimated vanadium and PM(10) doses to the lung and upper airway by using robust regression.
During the overhaul, 72% of boilermakers reported lower airway symptoms, and 67% reported upper airway symptoms. These percentages were 27 and 36 for controls. Boilermakers had more frequent and more severe upper and lower respiratory symptoms compared to utility workers, and this difference was greatest during interior boiler work. A statistically significant dose-response pattern for frequency and severity of both upper and lower respiratory symptoms was seen with vanadium and PM(10) in the three lower exposure quartiles. However, there was a reversal in the dose-response trend in the highest exposure quartile, reflecting a possible healthy worker effect.
Boilermakers experience more frequent and more severe respiratory symptoms than utility workers. This is most statistically significant during boiler work and is associated with increasing dose estimates of lung and nasal vanadium and PM(10).
职业性接触含高钒量的燃油灰可能导致呼吸道疾病。然而,从正常呼吸功能到呼吸功能受损的过程中可能出现哪些早期急性健康影响尚不清楚。
采用重复测量设计,我们前瞻性地研究了18名检修燃油锅炉的锅炉制造工和11名作为对照的公用事业工人。受试者每天使用0 - 3评分量表完成5次呼吸道症状日记,其中0 =无症状,1 =轻度症状,2 =中度症状,3 =重度症状。每日症状严重程度通过每天报告的上、下呼吸道症状的最高得分计算得出。每日症状频率通过将所有上呼吸道或下呼吸道症状报告相加,然后除以报告次数来计算。通过稳健回归分析呼吸道症状频率和严重程度与估计的肺部和上呼吸道钒及PM(10)剂量之间的剂量反应关系。
在检修期间,72%的锅炉制造工报告有下呼吸道症状,67%报告有上呼吸道症状。对照组的这两个百分比分别为27%和36%。与公用事业工人相比,锅炉制造工的上、下呼吸道症状更频繁、更严重,且这种差异在锅炉内部作业期间最为明显。在三个较低暴露四分位数中,钒和PM(10)与上、下呼吸道症状的频率和严重程度均呈现出具有统计学意义的剂量反应模式。然而,在最高暴露四分位数中,剂量反应趋势出现了逆转,这反映了可能的健康工人效应。
锅炉制造工比公用事业工人经历更频繁、更严重的呼吸道症状。这在锅炉作业期间在统计学上最为显著,并且与肺部和鼻腔钒及PM(10)剂量估计值的增加有关。