Suppr超能文献

对不耐受肠内营养的危重症患者序贯单次给予西沙必利、红霉素和甲氧氯普胺:一项随机、安慰剂对照、交叉研究。

Sequential single doses of cisapride, erythromycin, and metoclopramide in critically ill patients intolerant to enteral nutrition: a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study.

作者信息

MacLaren R, Kuhl D A, Gervasio J M, Brown R O, Dickerson R N, Livingston T N, Swift K, Headley S, Kudsk K A, Lima J J

机构信息

College of Pharmacy, Dalhousie University, NS, Canada.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2000 Feb;28(2):438-44. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200002000-00025.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the comparative efficacy of enteral cisapride, metoclopramide, erythromycin, and placebo for promoting gastric emptying in critically ill patients with intolerance to gastric enteral nutrition (EN).

DESIGN

A randomized, crossover study.

SETTING

Adult medical intensive care unit at a university-affiliated private hospital and trauma intensive care unit at a university teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

Ten adult, critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients not tolerating a fiber-containing EN product defined as a single aspirated gastric residual volume >150 mL or two aspirated gastric residual volumes >120 mL during a 12-hr period.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients received 10 mg of cisapride, 200 mg of erythromycin ethylsuccinate, 10 mg of metoclopramide, and placebo as 20 mL of sterile water every 12 hrs over 48 hrs. Acetaminophen solution (1000 mg) was administered concurrently. Gastric residual volumes were assessed, and plasma acetaminophen concentrations were serially determined by TDx between 0 and 12 hrs to evaluate gastric emptying.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Gastric residual volumes during the study were not significantly different between agents. No differences in area under the concentration vs. time curve or elimination rate constant were identified between agents. Metoclopramide and cisapride had a significantly shorter mean residence time of absorption than erythromycin (6.3+/-4.5 [SEM] mins and 10.9+/-5.8 vs. 30.1+/-4.5 mins, respectively [p<.05]). Metoclopramide (9.7+/-15.3 mins) had a significantly shorter time to peak concentration compared with erythromycin and placebo (60.7+/-8.1 and 50.9+/-13.5 mins, respectively [p<.05]). The time to onset of absorption was significantly shorter for metoclopramide vs. cisapride (5.7+/-4.5 vs. 22.9+/-5.7 mins [p<.05]).

CONCLUSION

In critically ill patients intolerant to EN, single enteral doses of metoclopramide or cisapride are effective for promoting gastric emptying in critically ill patients with gastric motility dysfunction. Additionally, metoclopramide may provide a quicker onset than cisapride.

摘要

目的

评估肠内使用西沙必利、甲氧氯普胺、红霉素及安慰剂对不耐受胃内肠内营养(EN)的重症患者促进胃排空的相对疗效。

设计

一项随机交叉研究。

地点

一所大学附属私立医院的成人医学重症监护病房及一所大学教学医院的创伤重症监护病房。

患者

10例成年重症机械通气患者,不耐受含纤维的EN产品,定义为在12小时内单次胃残余量>150 mL或两次胃残余量>120 mL。

干预措施

患者在48小时内每12小时接受10 mg西沙必利、200 mg琥乙红霉素、10 mg甲氧氯普胺及安慰剂(20 mL无菌水)。同时给予对乙酰氨基酚溶液(1000 mg)。评估胃残余量,并在0至12小时内通过荧光偏振免疫分析(TDx)连续测定血浆对乙酰氨基酚浓度以评估胃排空。

测量指标及主要结果

研究期间各药物组间胃残余量无显著差异。各药物组间浓度-时间曲线下面积或消除速率常数无差异。甲氧氯普胺和西沙必利的平均吸收停留时间显著短于红霉素(分别为6.3±4.5[标准误]分钟和10.9±5.8分钟,而红霉素为30.1±4.5分钟[p<0.05])。与红霉素和安慰剂相比,甲氧氯普胺达到峰值浓度的时间显著更短(分别为9.7±15.3分钟、60.7±8.1分钟和50.9±13.5分钟[p<0.05])。甲氧氯普胺的吸收起始时间显著短于西沙必利(5.7±4.5分钟对22.9±5.7分钟[p<0.05])。

结论

在不耐受EN的重症患者中,单剂量肠内使用甲氧氯普胺或西沙必利对伴有胃动力障碍的重症患者促进胃排空有效。此外,甲氧氯普胺起效可能比西沙必利更快。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验