Suppr超能文献

红霉素与甲氧氯普胺对危重症患者胃排空及肠内营养耐受性的影响

Erythromycin vs metoclopramide for facilitating gastric emptying and tolerance to intragastric nutrition in critically ill patients.

作者信息

MacLaren Robert, Kiser Tyree H, Fish Douglas N, Wischmeyer Paul E

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.

出版信息

JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2008 Jul-Aug;32(4):412-9. doi: 10.1177/0148607108319803.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to evaluate erythromycin vs metoclopramide for facilitating gastric emptying and tolerance to intragastric enteral nutrition (EN).

METHODS

Twenty critically ill patients with a gastric residual >150 mL while receiving EN were randomized to receive 4 intravenous doses of erythromycin 250 mg or metoclopramide 10 mg, each administered every 6 hours. Acetaminophen 975 mg was administered enterally at baseline and after the fourth dose. Acetaminophen peak plasma concentration (Cmax), concentration at 60 minutes (C(60)), time to Cmax (Tmax), and area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 60 minutes (AUC(0-60)) were determined. Residual volumes and feeding rates were recorded.

RESULTS

Compared with baseline, erythromycin increased Cmax (9.5 +/- 6.1 mg/L to 17.7 +/- 11.9 mg/L, P < .01), C(60) (5.4 +/- 3.5 mg/L to 12.9 +/- 7.6 mg/L, P < .01), and AUC(0-60) (3.5 +/- 3.0 mg.h/L to 12.5 +/- 8.7 mg.h/L, P < .01), while metoclopramide increased only AUC(0-60) (4.4 +/- 2.8 mg.h/L to 9.5 +/- 3.8 mg.hr/L, P < .05). Neither agent significantly reduced Tmax. Both erythromycin and metoclopramide reduced residual volumes (122 +/- 48 mL to 36 +/- 48 mL, P < .01, and 103 +/- 88 mL to 21 +/- 23 mL, P < .05, respectively) and allowed increased feeding rates (17 +/- 23 mL/h to 45 +/- 21 mL/h, P < .05, and 14 +/- 17 mL/h to 44 +/- 22 mL/h, P < .05, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Both agents facilitate tolerance to intragastric EN, but erythromycin may be more effective than metoclopramide for enhancing gastric motility.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估红霉素与甲氧氯普胺在促进胃排空及对胃内肠内营养(EN)耐受性方面的效果。

方法

20例在接受肠内营养时胃残余量>150 mL的重症患者被随机分为两组,分别接受4次静脉注射250 mg红霉素或10 mg甲氧氯普胺,每6小时给药一次。在基线期及第4次给药后经肠内给予975 mg对乙酰氨基酚。测定对乙酰氨基酚的血浆峰浓度(Cmax)、60分钟时的浓度(C(60))、达峰时间(Tmax)以及0至60分钟的浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC(0-60))。记录残余量和喂养速率。

结果

与基线相比,红霉素使Cmax(从9.5±6.1 mg/L增至17.7±11.9 mg/L,P<. .01)、C(60)(从5.4±3.5 mg/L增至12.9±7.6 mg/L,P<. .01)和AUC(0-60)(从3.5±3.0 mg·h/L增至12.5±8.7 mg·h/L,P<. .01)升高,而甲氧氯普胺仅使AUC(0-60)升高(从4.4±2.8 mg·h/L增至9.5±3.8 mg·hr/L,P<. .05)。两种药物均未显著缩短Tmax。红霉素和甲氧氯普胺均降低了残余量(分别从122±48 mL降至36±48 mL,P<. .01;从103±88 mL降至21±23 mL,P<. .05)并提高了喂养速率(分别从17±23 mL/h增至45±21 mL/h,P<. .05;从14±17 mL/h增至44±22 mL/h,P<. .05)。

结论

两种药物均有助于提高对胃内肠内营养的耐受性,但在增强胃动力方面,红霉素可能比甲氧氯普胺更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验