Suppr超能文献

温度和湿度模式的变化会影响体温调节和耐力表现吗?

Do changing patterns of heat and humidity influence thermoregulation and endurance performance?

作者信息

Cochrane D J, Sleivert G G

机构信息

School of Physical Education, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

出版信息

J Sci Med Sport. 1999 Dec;2(4):322-32. doi: 10.1016/s1440-2440(99)80005-x.

Abstract

The purpose of this project was to determine whether changing patterns of temperature and humidity, as expected in the morning versus afternoon, had a differential effect on thermoregulation and endurance performance. Eight male distance runners each participated in two heat pattern tests consisting of two hours treadmill running at 70%-maximum oxygen consumption. The mean heat load for each test was identical (22.2 degrees C wet bulb temperature) but either dry bulb temperature increased (24 to 27.5 degrees C) or decreased (27.5 to 24 degrees C) over the course of the two hour heat stress test. Whole body sweat rate was 10.7% higher (p<0.05) and there was greater plasma volume loss (2.7 versus 1.6%, p<0.05) in the cooling versus warming pattern test. Mean skin and body temperature changed in a significantly different (p<0.05) manner between the two patterns and closely followed ambient dry bulb temperature change. The thermoregulatory variables of heart rate and rectal temperature were not affected and performance did not differ between pattern tests. Ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and oxygen consumption were also not significantly different between cooling and warming test. In summary, although some minor differences were noted, thermal homeostasis was maintained equally well during either warming or cooling for wet bulb temperatures between 24 and 27 degrees C. The mean heat load is therefore more important than changing patterns of temperature and humidity in determining an individual's physiological response to exercise in a warm environment.

摘要

本项目的目的是确定温度和湿度模式的变化(如上午与下午所预期的那样)是否对体温调节和耐力表现有不同影响。八名男性长跑运动员每人参加了两项热模式测试,包括在跑步机上以最大耗氧量的70%进行两小时跑步。每次测试的平均热负荷相同(湿球温度22.2摄氏度),但在两小时的热应激测试过程中,干球温度要么升高(从24摄氏度升至27.5摄氏度),要么降低(从27.5摄氏度降至24摄氏度)。与升温模式测试相比,降温模式测试中的全身出汗率高出10.7%(p<0.05),血浆量损失更大(2.7%对1.6%,p<0.05)。两种模式下平均皮肤温度和体温的变化方式有显著差异(p<0.05),且与环境干球温度变化密切相关。心率和直肠温度等体温调节变量未受影响,两种模式测试中的表现也无差异。降温测试与升温测试之间的主观用力程度(RPE)和耗氧量也无显著差异。总之,尽管注意到了一些细微差异,但在24至27摄氏度的湿球温度下,无论是升温还是降温过程中,热稳态都能同样良好地维持。因此,在确定个体在温暖环境中对运动的生理反应时,平均热负荷比温度和湿度模式的变化更为重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验