Beeman M J, Bowden E M, Gernsbacher M A
Section of Cognitive Neuroscience, Rush Medical College.
Brain Lang. 2000 Feb 1;71(2):310-36. doi: 10.1006/brln.1999.2268.
In three experiments, healthy young participants listened to stories promoting inferences and named inference-related test words presented to the right visual field-Left Hemisphere (rvf-LH) or to the left visual field-Right Hemisphere (lvf-RH). Participants showed priming for predictive inferences only for target words presented to the lvf-RH; in contrast, they showed priming for coherence inferences only for target words presented to the rvf-LH. These results, plus the fact that patients with RH brain damage have difficulty drawing coherence inferences and do not show inference-related priming, suggest that information capable of supporting predictive inferences is more likely to be initially activated in the RH than the LH, but following coherence breaks these concepts (now coherence inferences) are completed in the LH. These results are consistent with the theory that the RH engages in relatively coarse semantic coding, which aids full comprehension of discourse.
在三项实验中,健康的年轻参与者听了一些促进推理的故事,并说出呈现给右视野-左半球(rvf-LH)或左视野-右半球(lvf-RH)的与推理相关的测试词。参与者仅对呈现给lvf-RH的目标词表现出预测推理的启动效应;相反,他们仅对呈现给rvf-LH的目标词表现出连贯推理的启动效应。这些结果,再加上右脑损伤患者在进行连贯推理时存在困难且未表现出与推理相关的启动效应这一事实,表明能够支持预测推理的信息更有可能最初在右脑而非左脑被激活,但在连贯性中断后,这些概念(现在是连贯推理)在左脑完成。这些结果与右脑进行相对粗略的语义编码这一理论一致,这种编码有助于对话语的全面理解。