Aten Primaria. 2000 Feb 28;25(3):153-9. doi: 10.1016/S0212-6567(00)78479-4.
To evaluate the effectiveness and the cost of antibiotic treatment of chronic bronchitis (CB) crises and COPD in PC.
Prospective cohort study of patients with CB and COPD monitored in health districts. Information was requested on the first ten patients, without any selection, who attended for consultation with the diagnosis of a crisis in their CB or COPD. They were followed for 30 days and the direct costs of their care were evaluated. The cost-effectiveness of the various types of antibiotic treatment was analysed.
268 doctors took part and provided 2354 patients who were valid for the study. 20.8% (490/2354) came back within 30 days because of poor evolution: 79 (3.3%) of these needed hospital admission. The average cost of the failure was 57,687 pesetas. The cost of the use of cephixime was 14,388 pesetas per crisis, with 82.5% effectiveness. The cost for the alternative of "other antibiotics" was 19,775 pesetas, with 73.4% effectiveness. For the alternative amoxycillin-clavulanic acid, the cost was 18,647 pesetas with 74.4% effectiveness.
A fifth of the patients evolved poorly, which led to the admission of 3.3%. Cephixime treatment was the dominant treatment, as it is more effective and cheaper than all the other antibiotics and than amoxycillin-clavulanic acid treatment. The cost of the therapeutic failure of crises is more than three times greater than the cost of antibiotic treatment. The rate of failure, which means considerable morbidity at very high cost, must be reduced.
评估基层医疗中慢性支气管炎(CB)急性发作和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)抗生素治疗的有效性及成本。
在健康区对CB和COPD患者进行前瞻性队列研究。选取最初十位因CB或COPD急性发作前来就诊且未经过任何筛选的患者。对他们进行30天的随访,并评估其治疗的直接成本。分析了各类抗生素治疗的成本效益。
268名医生参与研究,共提供了2354例符合研究要求的患者。20.8%(490/2354)的患者在30天内因病情进展不佳复诊:其中79例(3.3%)需要住院治疗。治疗失败的平均成本为57,687比塞塔。头孢克肟每次急性发作的使用成本为14,388比塞塔,有效性为82.5%。“其他抗生素”替代方案的成本为19,775比塞塔,有效性为73.4%。阿莫西林-克拉维酸替代方案的成本为18,647比塞塔,有效性为74.4%。
五分之一的患者病情进展不佳,导致3.3%的患者住院。头孢克肟治疗是主要治疗方法,因为它比所有其他抗生素以及阿莫西林-克拉维酸治疗更有效且成本更低。急性发作治疗失败的成本比抗生素治疗成本高出三倍多。必须降低失败率,因为其意味着以极高成本造成相当高的发病率。