Pocock S J, Henderson R A, Clayton T, Lyman G H, Chamberlain D A
Medical Statistics Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Mar 15;35(4):907-14. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00637-3.
We sought to evaluate the impact of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and medical treatment on self-perceived quality of life among patients with angina.
The second Randomized Intervention Treatment of Angina trial (RITA-2) implemented initial policies of PTCA or continued medical treatment in patients with angina, allowing assessment of long-term health consequences.
A total of 1,018 patients were randomly assigned (504 to PTCA and 514 to medical treatment). The short form 36 (SF-36) self-administered quality-of-life questionnaire was completed at randomization and three months, one year and three years later. To date, 98% of patients reached one year and 67% reached three years.
The PTCA group had significantly greater improvements in physical functioning, vitality and general health at both three months and one year, but not at three years. These quality-of-life scores were strongly related to breathlessness, angina grade and treadmill exercise time both at baseline and at one year. The treatment differences in quality of life are explained by the PTCA group's improvements in breathlessness, angina and exercise time. The attenuation of treatment difference at three years is partly attributed to 27% of medically treated patients receiving nonrandomized interventions in the interim. For both groups, there were also improvements in ratings of physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social functioning, pain and mental health, but for these the superiority of PTCA over medical treatment was less pronounced. After one year, 33% and 22% of the PTCA and medical groups, respectively, rated their health much better.
Coronary angioplasty substantially improves patient-perceived quality of life, especially physical functioning and vitality, as compared with continued medical treatment. These differences are attributed to alleviation of cardiac symptoms (specifically, breathlessness and angina), but must be balanced against the small procedure-related risks of PTCA.
我们试图评估经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术(PTCA)和药物治疗对心绞痛患者自我感知生活质量的影响。
第二项心绞痛随机干预治疗试验(RITA - 2)对心绞痛患者实施了PTCA初始策略或持续药物治疗,从而能够评估长期健康后果。
总共1018例患者被随机分配(504例接受PTCA,514例接受药物治疗)。在随机分组时以及3个月、1年和3年后完成了36项简短健康调查(SF - 36)自我管理的生活质量问卷。迄今为止,98%的患者达到1年随访,67%的患者达到3年随访。
PTCA组在3个月和1年时,身体功能、活力和总体健康状况有显著更大改善,但在3年时没有。这些生活质量评分在基线和1年时与呼吸急促、心绞痛分级和跑步机运动时间密切相关。生活质量的治疗差异可通过PTCA组在呼吸急促、心绞痛和运动时间方面的改善来解释。3年时治疗差异的减弱部分归因于27%接受药物治疗的患者在此期间接受了非随机干预。对于两组,身体角色功能、情感角色功能、社会功能、疼痛和心理健康评分也有改善,但对于这些方面,PTCA相对于药物治疗的优势不太明显。1年后,PTCA组和药物治疗组分别有33%和22%的患者对其健康状况评价要好得多。
与持续药物治疗相比,冠状动脉成形术显著改善了患者自我感知的生活质量,尤其是身体功能和活力。这些差异归因于心脏症状(特别是呼吸急促和心绞痛)的缓解,但必须与PTCA相关的小手术风险相权衡。