• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单支冠状动脉疾病患者随机接受经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术(PTCA)或药物治疗的两到三年随访(退伍军人事务部合作研究结果)。退伍军人事务部合作研究项目ACME研究人员。血管成形术与药物治疗对比研究。

Two- to three-year follow-up of patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease randomized to PTCA or medical therapy (results of a VA cooperative study). Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program ACME Investigators. Angioplasty Compared to Medicine.

作者信息

Hartigan P M, Giacomini J C, Folland E D, Parisi A F

机构信息

Cooperative Studies Coordinating Center, Veterans Affairs Connecticut Health Care Systems, West Haven 06516, USA.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1998 Dec 15;82(12):1445-50. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00685-7.

DOI:10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00685-7
PMID:9874045
Abstract

Despite increasing use of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) to treat stenotic coronary artery disease, there are relatively few prospective studies evaluating its long-term effectiveness. We prospectively randomized 212 stable patients with provocable myocardial ischemia and single-vessel subocclusive coronary disease to receive primary therapy with either PTCA or medical therapy. This report presents the clinical follow-up of these patients at a mean, after randomization, of 2.4 years for interview and 3.0 years for exercise testing. Of the 212 patients originally randomized, 175 received an extended follow-up interview, and 132 underwent exercise testing; 62% of patients in the PTCA group were angina free compared with 47% of patients in the medical group (p <0.05). Furthermore, exercise duration as measured by treadmill testing was prolonged by 1.33 minutes over baseline in the PTCA group, whereas it decreased by 0.28 minutes in the medical group (p <0.04). Although the angina-free time on the treadmill was not different (p=0.50), fewer patients in the medical group developed angina on the treadmill at 3 years than those in the PTCA group (p=0.04). By 36 months, excluding the initial randomized PTCA, use of PTCA and use of coronary artery bypass surgery were not different in the 2 treatment groups. These data indicate that some of the early benefits derived from PTCA in patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease are sustained, making it an attractive therapeutic option for these patients.

摘要

尽管经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术(PTCA)在治疗狭窄性冠状动脉疾病中的应用日益增加,但评估其长期疗效的前瞻性研究相对较少。我们将212例患有可诱发性心肌缺血和单支血管次全闭塞性冠状动脉疾病的稳定患者进行前瞻性随机分组,分别接受PTCA或药物治疗作为初始治疗。本报告介绍了这些患者在随机分组后的临床随访情况,平均随访时间为访谈2.4年、运动试验3.0年。在最初随机分组的212例患者中,175例接受了延长随访访谈,132例接受了运动试验;PTCA组62%的患者无心绞痛,而药物治疗组为47%(p<0.05)。此外,通过跑步机试验测量,PTCA组的运动持续时间较基线延长了1.33分钟,而药物治疗组缩短了0.28分钟(p<0.04)。虽然跑步机上的无心绞痛时间没有差异(p=0.50),但3年时药物治疗组在跑步机上发生心绞痛的患者比PTCA组少(p=0.04)。到36个月时,排除最初随机接受PTCA的患者,两个治疗组中PTCA的使用和冠状动脉旁路移植术的使用没有差异。这些数据表明,PTCA在单支血管冠状动脉疾病患者中获得的一些早期益处得以持续,使其成为这些患者有吸引力的治疗选择。

相似文献

1
Two- to three-year follow-up of patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease randomized to PTCA or medical therapy (results of a VA cooperative study). Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program ACME Investigators. Angioplasty Compared to Medicine.单支冠状动脉疾病患者随机接受经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术(PTCA)或药物治疗的两到三年随访(退伍军人事务部合作研究结果)。退伍军人事务部合作研究项目ACME研究人员。血管成形术与药物治疗对比研究。
Am J Cardiol. 1998 Dec 15;82(12):1445-50. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00685-7.
2
A comparison of angioplasty with medical therapy in the treatment of single-vessel coronary artery disease. Veterans Affairs ACME Investigators.血管成形术与药物治疗在单支冠状动脉疾病治疗中的比较。退伍军人事务部ACME研究人员。
N Engl J Med. 1992 Jan 2;326(1):10-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199201023260102.
3
Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus medical therapy for stable angina pectoris: outcomes for patients with double-vessel versus single-vessel coronary artery disease in a Veterans Affairs Cooperative randomized trial. Veterans Affairs ACME InvestigatorS.经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术与药物治疗稳定型心绞痛的比较:退伍军人事务部合作随机试验中双支血管与单支血管冠状动脉疾病患者的结局。退伍军人事务部ACME研究人员
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997 Jun;29(7):1505-11. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00097-1.
4
A comparison of quality of life scores in patients with angina pectoris after angioplasty compared with after medical therapy. Outcomes of a randomized clinical trial. Veterans Affairs Study of Angioplasty Compared to Medical Therapy Investigators.血管成形术后与药物治疗后心绞痛患者生活质量评分的比较。一项随机临床试验的结果。退伍军人事务部血管成形术与药物治疗比较研究调查人员。
Circulation. 1995 Oct 1;92(7):1710-9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.92.7.1710.
5
Ten-year outcome after coronary angioplasty in patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease and comparison with the results of the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS).单支冠状动脉疾病患者冠状动脉血管成形术后的十年预后及与冠状动脉外科研究(CASS)结果的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2000 Feb 1;85(3):321-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00740-7.
6
Quality of life after coronary angioplasty or continued medical treatment for angina: three-year follow-up in the RITA-2 trial. Randomized Intervention Treatment of Angina.冠状动脉成形术后或继续药物治疗心绞痛后的生活质量:RITA-2试验的三年随访。心绞痛随机干预治疗。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Mar 15;35(4):907-14. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00637-3.
7
Five-year clinical and functional outcome comparing bypass surgery and angioplasty in patients with multivessel coronary disease. A multicenter randomized trial. Writing Group for the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) Investigators.多支冠状动脉疾病患者搭桥手术与血管成形术的五年临床及功能转归比较:一项多中心随机试验。搭桥血管成形术血运重建研究(BARI)调查组撰写组。
JAMA. 1997 Mar 5;277(9):715-21.
8
Coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery: the Randomized Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA) trial.冠状动脉血管成形术与冠状动脉搭桥手术:心绞痛随机干预治疗(RITA)试验。
Lancet. 1993 Mar 6;341(8845):573-80.
9
Coronary angioplasty versus medical therapy for angina: the second Randomised Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA-2) trial. RITA-2 trial participants.冠状动脉血管成形术与药物治疗心绞痛:第二项随机干预治疗心绞痛(RITA - 2)试验。RITA - 2试验参与者。
Lancet. 1997 Aug 16;350(9076):461-8.
10
Sustained efficacy of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术的持续疗效
Am Heart J. 1986 Feb;111(2):233-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(86)90133-x.

引用本文的文献

1
[Should I treat a high-risk chronic coronary syndrome in an invasive way from the beginning? No, in most cases].[我应该从一开始就以侵入性方式治疗高危慢性冠状动脉综合征吗?不,在大多数情况下并非如此]。
Arch Peru Cardiol Cir Cardiovasc. 2020 Dec 31;1(4):229-239. doi: 10.47487/apcyccv.v1i4.98. eCollection 2020 Oct-Dec.
2
Treatment Strategies for Chronic Coronary Heart Disease with Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction or Preserved Ejection Fraction-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.左心室收缩功能障碍或射血分数保留的慢性冠心病治疗策略——一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Pathophysiology. 2023 Dec 18;30(4):640-658. doi: 10.3390/pathophysiology30040046.
3
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Is Not Superior to Optimal Medical Therapy in Chronic Coronary Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在慢性冠状动脉综合征中并不优于最佳药物治疗:一项荟萃分析。
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 9;12(4):1395. doi: 10.3390/jcm12041395.
4
Harmonizing the Paradigm With the Data in Stable Coronary Artery Disease: A Review and Viewpoint.使稳定型冠状动脉疾病的范式与数据相协调:综述与观点
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Nov 13;6(11):e007006. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007006.
5
Effect of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Survival in Patients with Stable Ischemic Heart Disease.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对稳定型缺血性心脏病患者生存率的影响。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2017 Feb;19(2):17. doi: 10.1007/s11886-017-0821-6.
6
Who is eligible for randomized trials? A comparison between the exclusion criteria defined by the ISCHEMIA trial and 3102 real-world patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing stent implantation in a single cardiology center.谁适合参加随机试验?缺血性心脏病试验定义的排除标准与单中心心脏病科3102例接受支架植入术的稳定冠状动脉疾病真实世界患者的比较。
Trials. 2015 Sep 15;16:411. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0934-4.
7
Intracoronary adenosine to prevent myonecrosis in patients with stable angina undergoing percutaneous interventions: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.冠状动脉内注射腺苷预防接受经皮介入治疗的稳定型心绞痛患者心肌坏死:一项双盲随机对照试验
J Tehran Heart Cent. 2013 Jan;8(1):28-34. Epub 2013 Jan 8.
8
Coronary artery disease: to cath or not to cath? When and how best to cath: those are the remaining questions.冠状动脉疾病:做冠状动脉造影还是不做?何时以及如何进行最佳冠状动脉造影:这些都是尚存的问题。
Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2013;3(1):27-38. Epub 2013 Feb 17.
9
Outcomes of revascularization strategies for two-vessel coronary artery disease involving the proximal left anterior descending artery in an era of improved pharmacotherapy and stenting.在药物治疗和支架置入术得到改善的时代,针对累及左前降支近端的双支冠状动脉疾病的血运重建策略的结果。
Can J Cardiol. 2008 Feb;24(2):121-6. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(08)70567-1.
10
Medical treatment of patients with stable angina pectoris referred for coronary angiography: failure of treatment or failure to treat.因冠状动脉造影而接受治疗的稳定型心绞痛患者的医学治疗:治疗失败还是未进行治疗。
Clin Cardiol. 2002 Sep;25(9):436-41. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960250908.