dos Santos Lucas A C, Bermejo A, Fernández P, Tabernero M J
Department of Clinical Analysis and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Amazonas, Brazil.
J Anal Toxicol. 2000 Mar;24(2):93-6. doi: 10.1093/jat/24.2.93.
Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) with a 100-microm polydimethylsiloxane film fiber was applied to the determination of methadone and 2-ethylidine-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP) by GC-MS in human saliva and compared with liquid-liquid extraction. A shorter extraction time of 30 min with the fiber was obtained, speeding up the total analysis time. Linearity was found for SPME from 0.05 to 2.0 microg/mL (r = 0.9976 for methadone; r = 0.9988 for EDDP) with precision between 0.7 and 4.3% for saliva spiked with 0.2 and 1.5 microg/mL of methadone and EDDP. The limit of detection using SPME was 0.04 microg/mL for methadone and 0.008 microg/mL for EDDP. Analytical recoveries of SPME and liquid-liquid extraction ranged from 98.8 to 103.6%. The use of deuterated internal standard by both methods have yielded comparable results. Thus, the SPME method is highly accurate, precise, and useful for determination of methadone and EDDP in saliva.
采用涂有100微米聚二甲基硅氧烷薄膜的固相微萃取(SPME)纤维,通过气相色谱-质谱联用(GC-MS)法测定人唾液中的美沙酮和2-亚乙基-3,3-二苯基吡咯烷(EDDP),并与液-液萃取法进行比较。使用该纤维萃取时间缩短至30分钟,加快了总分析时间。SPME法在0.05至2.0微克/毫升范围内呈线性(美沙酮的r = 0.9976;EDDP的r = 0.9988),对于添加了0.2和1.5微克/毫升美沙酮及EDDP的唾液,精密度在0.7%至4.3%之间。使用SPME法时,美沙酮的检测限为0.04微克/毫升,EDDP的检测限为0.008微克/毫升。SPME法和液-液萃取法的分析回收率在98.8%至103.6%之间。两种方法使用氘代内标均得到了可比的结果。因此,SPME法对于测定唾液中的美沙酮和EDDP具有高度准确性、精密度且实用。