Kinetics of nuclear maturation and protein profiles of oocytes from prepubertal and adult cattle during in vitro maturation.

The aim of this present study was to compare the kinetics of nuclear maturation between calf and cow oocytes in order to determine if there are differences between the 2 groups which could explain their disparate developmental capacity. The constitutive and neosynthetic protein patterns of cow and calf oocytes and of their corresponding cumulus cells were also compared during in vitro maturation. A total of 397 calf oocytes and 406 cow oocytes was matured in M199 + 10 ng/mL EGF. The first group of oocytes (n = 30) was immediately fixed and stained after removal from the follicle, and represent 0 h. The remaining oocytes were removed from the maturation medium at 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 h respectively. Half were denuded, fixed and stained for nuclear status; while the remainder were radiolabeled with methionine-(35S). Immediately after isolation, all the oocytes were at the GV stage. By 8 h, GVBD had occurred in most oocytes (calf: 97%; cow: 100%) and some had reached pro-metaphase I (calf: 49%; cow: 51%). By 12 h, most of the oocytes were at metaphase I (calf: 84%; cow: 94%). By 16 h, 54% of calf oocytes had reached telophase I or beyond compared with 71% of cow oocytes. This difference between the 2 groups became significant by 20 h, with 89% of cow oocytes (P < 0.05) at metaphase II and 71% of calf oocytes. By 24 h of culture, GVBD had occurred in all cases. Most oocytes completed meiosis I and were arrested at metaphase II with the first polar body extruded (calf: 72%; cow: 86%). No differences were noted in the constitutive and the neosynthetic protein profiles of cumulus cells in relation to the age of animal. Changes in neosynthetic protein patterns were observed both in cow and calf cumulus during IVM, and several proteins showed stage-specific synthesis. For the constitutive protein patterns of cow and calf oocytes, there were quantitative (38 and 40 kD) and qualitative (4, 10, 16, 17, 24, 25 and 26 kD) differences between the 2 groups. Only a few differences were observed in neosynthetic proteins between cow and calf oocytes, but there were changes in relation to nuclear status both in cow and calf oocytes. In conclusion, the difference in developmental capacity between cow and calf oocytes may be explained by a difference in the kinetics of nuclear maturation, which was significant at 20 h of culture (with 89% of cow oocytes at metaphase II and 71% of calf oocytes). At the biochemical level, our results indicate that nuclear progression during in vitro maturation of bovine oocytes is linked to changes in protein synthesis by the oocyte itself, while cumulus protein synthesis may either stimulate or modulate the process of oocyte maturation.