Debat V, Alibert P, David P, Paradis E, Auffray J C
Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution, UMR 5554 CNRS, CC 064, Université Montpellier, France.
Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Mar 7;267(1442):423-30. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1017.
The relationship between the two components of developmental homeostasis, that is canalization and developmental stability (DS), is currently debated. To appraise this relationship, the levels and morphological patterns of interindividual variation and fluctuating asymmetry were assessed using a geometric morphometric approach applied to the skulls of laboratory samples of the house mouse. These three samples correspond to two random-bred strains of the two European subspecies of the house mouse and their F1 hybrids. The inter- and intraindividual variation levels were found to be smaller in the hybrid group compared to the parental ones, suggesting a common heterotic effect on skull canalization and DS. Both buffering mechanisms might then depend on the same genetic condition, i.e. the level of heterozygosity. However, related morphological patterns did not exhibit any congruence. In contradiction with previous studies on insect wing traits, we therefore suggest that canalization and DS may not act on the same morphological characters. The fact that this discrepancy could be related to the functional importance of the symmetry of the characters under consideration is discussed in the light of our knowledge of the genetic bases of both components of developmental homeostasis.
发育稳态的两个组成部分,即发育稳态化和发育稳定性(DS)之间的关系目前存在争议。为了评估这种关系,我们使用几何形态测量方法对家鼠实验室样本的头骨进行分析,以评估个体间变异和波动不对称的水平及形态模式。这三个样本对应家鼠两个欧洲亚种的两个随机繁殖品系及其F1杂种。结果发现,与亲本群体相比,杂种群体的个体间和个体内变异水平较小,这表明对颅骨发育稳态化和DS存在共同的杂种优势效应。那么这两种缓冲机制可能都取决于相同的遗传条件,即杂合度水平。然而,相关的形态模式并未表现出任何一致性。与之前关于昆虫翅性状的研究相反,因此我们认为发育稳态化和DS可能不会作用于相同的形态特征。鉴于我们对发育稳态这两个组成部分的遗传基础的了解,讨论了这种差异可能与所考虑特征对称性的功能重要性相关的事实。