Almbrand B, Johannesson M, Sjöstrand B, Malmberg K, Rydén L
Department of Cardiology, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Eur Heart J. 2000 May;21(9):733-9. doi: 10.1053/euhj.1999.1859.
The aim of the present analysis was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of intense insulin treatment after acute myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes mellitus based on the results of the Diabetes Mellitus Insulin Glucose Infusion in Acute Myocardial Infarction (DIGAMI) study. In this study 620 patients with diabetes mellitus and acute myocardial infarction were randomized to intense insulin treatment (insulin group) or to serve as controls given standard antidiabetic therapy. Mortality was significantly reduced in the insulin group.
The cost-effectiveness ratio was estimated as the incremental cost per life-year and quality-adjusted life-year gained of intense insulin treatment. The incremental costs were estimated as the difference in health care costs and indirect costs (labour production) during the first year of follow-up plus the future costs of increased survival. The life-years gained were based on the 5-year long-term follow-up experience and an assumed annual 20% mortality risk for all patients thereafter. The health care costs were Euro 975 higher in the insulin group during the first year of follow-up, mainly due to a longer period of initial hospitalization related to the institution of multidose insulin. The estimated discounted gain in life-years of the insulin treatment was 0.94 years without and 0.66 with quality of life adjustment, respectively. The cost per life-year gained by intense insulin treatment was Euro 16 900 and the cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained was Euro 24 100. Thus the estimated cost-effectiveness ratios were relatively low.
The results of the DIGAMI study indicate that intense insulin treatment after an acute myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes mellitus has an acceptable level of cost-effectiveness.
本次分析的目的是根据急性心肌梗死糖尿病患者胰岛素葡萄糖输注(DIGAMI)研究的结果,评估急性心肌梗死后强化胰岛素治疗的成本效益。在这项研究中,620例糖尿病合并急性心肌梗死患者被随机分为强化胰岛素治疗组(胰岛素组)或接受标准抗糖尿病治疗作为对照组。胰岛素组的死亡率显著降低。
成本效益比被估计为强化胰岛素治疗每获得一个生命年和质量调整生命年的增量成本。增量成本被估计为随访第一年医疗保健成本和间接成本(劳动生产率)的差异加上生存增加的未来成本。获得的生命年基于5年的长期随访经验以及此后所有患者假定的每年20%的死亡风险。随访第一年胰岛素组的医疗保健成本高出975欧元,主要是由于与多剂量胰岛素治疗相关的初始住院时间较长。胰岛素治疗估计的贴现生命年增益分别为0.94年(未调整生活质量)和0.66年(调整生活质量)。强化胰岛素治疗每获得一个生命年的成本为16900欧元,每获得一个质量调整生命年的成本为24100欧元。因此,估计的成本效益比相对较低。
DIGAMI研究结果表明,糖尿病患者急性心肌梗死后强化胰岛素治疗具有可接受的成本效益水平。