Helms P J
Department of Child Health, University of Aberdeen Medical School,Foresterhill, Aberdeen, Scotland.
Drugs. 2000;59 Suppl 1:15-22; discussion 43-5. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200059001-00003.
During the last 30 years, a significant rise in wheezing illness has occurred in the child population. Despite its high prevalence there is no clear definition of the disease, which includes a heterogeneous group of syndromes ranging from transient wheezing in infancy to atopic asthma with persistence into adult life. Molecular advances and further epidemiological information from well characterised individuals and their families are likely to clarify the different subtypes of wheezing illness and inform therapeutic options. With the recognition that chronic airway inflammation is a feature of persistent disease, at least in adults, there has been a trend towards the early introduction of anti-inflammatory treatment and particularly inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). However, the natural resolution of much wheezing illness, particularly in young children and in children with viral-induced episodes, suggests that newly presenting children should remain on symptomatic therapy alone while the severity of the disease is being assessed. Although ICS have become a cornerstone of management of chronic persistent disease, their ability to protect against exacerbations in young and mildly affected children is questionable. Alongside concerns about long term use of ICS and possible systemic adverse effects, there remains a need for alternative approaches to the control of the disease in children. Extrapolation of the findings of large multicentre adult studies into childhood, particularly for doubling the doses of ICS and long-acting beta2-agonists, may be unsound. Other approaches include the early introduction of inhaled cromones, use of second generation antihistamines, low dose theophyllines and, more recently, leukotriene modifiers. As the majority of preschool children will become asymptomatic by mid-childhood, there is an urgent need to identify those in whom chronic airway inflammation is developing, as it is in this group that early introduction of ICS may be of maximum benefit. In the remainder, other approaches, including use of corticosteroid-sparing longacting P2-agonists and leukotriene modifying drugs, may be more appropriate. Safe and effective oral preparations such as leukotriene modifying drugs are likely to establish a significant role in the management of symptoms in children of all ages and with all types of asthma and wheezing illness.
在过去30年里,儿童群体中喘息性疾病显著增加。尽管其患病率很高,但该疾病尚无明确的定义,它包括一组异质性综合征,从婴儿期的短暂喘息到持续至成年期的特应性哮喘。分子生物学的进展以及来自特征明确的个体及其家庭的进一步流行病学信息,可能会阐明喘息性疾病的不同亚型,并为治疗选择提供依据。随着人们认识到慢性气道炎症是持续性疾病的一个特征,至少在成年人中如此,出现了早期引入抗炎治疗尤其是吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)的趋势。然而,许多喘息性疾病可自然缓解,特别是在幼儿以及病毒诱发发作的儿童中,这表明新出现症状的儿童在评估疾病严重程度时应仅接受对症治疗。尽管ICS已成为慢性持续性疾病管理的基石,但其预防年幼和轻度受累儿童病情加重的能力仍存在疑问。除了对长期使用ICS及其可能的全身不良反应的担忧外,仍然需要其他控制儿童疾病的方法。将大型多中心成人研究的结果外推至儿童,尤其是将ICS和长效β2受体激动剂的剂量加倍,可能并不合理。其他方法包括早期引入吸入性色酮、使用第二代抗组胺药、低剂量茶碱以及最近的白三烯调节剂。由于大多数学龄前儿童到童年中期将不再有症状,因此迫切需要识别那些正在发生慢性气道炎症的儿童,因为正是在这组儿童中早期引入ICS可能获益最大。对于其余儿童,其他方法,包括使用可减少糖皮质激素用量的长效β2受体激动剂和白三烯调节药物,可能更为合适。安全有效的口服制剂如白三烯调节药物可能在各年龄段、各种类型哮喘和喘息性疾病儿童的症状管理中发挥重要作用。