Schnitzer T, Bone H G, Crepaldi G, Adami S, McClung M, Kiel D, Felsenberg D, Recker R R, Tonino R P, Roux C, Pinchera A, Foldes A J, Greenspan S L, Levine M A, Emkey R, Santora A C, Kaur A, Thompson D E, Yates J, Orloff J J
Aging (Milano). 2000 Feb;12(1):1-12.
Dosing convenience is a key element in the effective management of any chronic disease, and is particularly important in the long-term management of osteoporosis. Less frequent dosing with any medication may enhance compliance, thereby maximizing the effectiveness of therapy. Animal data support the rationale that once-weekly dosing with alendronate 70 mg (7 times the daily oral treatment dose) could provide similar efficacy to daily dosing with alendronate 10 mg due to its long duration of effect in bone. In addition, dog studies suggest that the potential for esophageal irritation, observed with daily oral bisphosphonates, may be substantially reduced with once-weekly dosing. This dosing regimen would provide patients with increased convenience and would be likely to enhance patient compliance. We compared the efficacy and safety of treatment with oral once-weekly alendronate 70 mg (N=519), twice-weekly alendronate 35 mg (N=369), and daily alendronate 10 mg (N=370) in a one-year, double-blind, multicenter study of postmenopausal women (ages 42 to 95) with osteoporosis (bone mineral density [BMD] of either lumbar spine or femoral neck at least 2.5 SDs below peak premenopausal mean, or prior vertebral or hip fracture). The primary efficacy endpoint was the comparability of increases in lumbar spine BMD, using strict pre-defined equivalence criteria. Secondary endpoints included changes in BMD at the hip and total body and rate of bone turnover, as assessed by biochemical markers. Both of the new regimens fully satisfied the equivalence criteria relative to daily therapy. Mean increases in lumbar spine BMD at 12 months were: 5.1% (95% CI 4.8, 5.4) in the 70 mg once-weekly group, 5.2% (4.9, 5.6) in the 35 mg twice-weekly group, and 5.4% (5.0, 5.8) in the 10 mg daily treatment group. Increases in BMD at the total hip, femoral neck, trochanter, and total body were similar for the three dosing regimens. All three treatment groups similarly reduced biochemical markers of bone resorption (urinary N-telopeptides of type I collagen) and bone formation (serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase) into the middle of the premenopausal reference range. All treatment regimens were well tolerated with a similar incidence of upper GI adverse experiences. There were fewer serious upper GI adverse experiences and a trend toward a lower incidence of esophageal events in the once-weekly dosing group compared to the daily dosing group. These data are consistent with preclinical animal models, and suggest that once-weekly dosing has the potential for improved upper GI tolerability. Clinical fractures, captured as adverse experiences, were similar among the groups. We conclude that the alendronate 70 mg once-weekly dosing regimen will provide patients with a more convenient, therapeutically equivalent alternative to daily dosing, and may enhance compliance and long-term persistence with therapy.
给药便利性是有效管理任何慢性疾病的关键因素,在骨质疏松症的长期管理中尤为重要。任何药物减少给药频率都可能提高依从性,从而使治疗效果最大化。动物实验数据支持这样的理论依据:阿仑膦酸钠70毫克每周一次给药(是每日口服治疗剂量的7倍),因其在骨骼中的作用持续时间长,可能与阿仑膦酸钠10毫克每日一次给药疗效相似。此外,对犬类的研究表明,每日口服双膦酸盐类药物时出现的食管刺激可能性,每周一次给药可能会大幅降低。这种给药方案将为患者提供更大的便利性,并可能提高患者依从性。在一项针对年龄42至95岁患有骨质疏松症(腰椎或股骨颈骨矿物质密度[BMD]至少比绝经前峰值均值低2.5个标准差,或既往有椎体或髋部骨折)的绝经后女性进行的为期一年的双盲多中心研究中,我们比较了口服阿仑膦酸钠70毫克每周一次(N = 519)、阿仑膦酸钠35毫克每周两次(N = 369)和阿仑膦酸钠10毫克每日一次(N = 370)治疗的疗效和安全性。主要疗效终点是使用严格预定义的等效标准,比较腰椎BMD增加的可比性。次要终点包括髋部和全身BMD的变化以及通过生化标志物评估的骨转换率。两种新方案相对于每日治疗均完全满足等效标准。12个月时腰椎BMD的平均增加幅度为:70毫克每周一次组为5.1%(95%可信区间4.8, 5.4),35毫克每周两次组为5.2%(4.9, 5.6),10毫克每日治疗组为5.4%(5.0, 5.8)。三种给药方案在全髋、股骨颈、大转子和全身的BMD增加情况相似。所有三个治疗组同样将骨吸收(I型胶原尿N - 端肽)和骨形成(血清骨特异性碱性磷酸酶)的生化标志物降低到绝经前参考范围的中间值。所有治疗方案耐受性良好,上消化道不良事件发生率相似。与每日给药组相比,每周一次给药组严重上消化道不良事件较少,食管事件发生率有降低趋势。这些数据与临床前动物模型一致,表明每周一次给药有可能改善上消化道耐受性。作为不良事件记录的临床骨折在各组之间相似。我们得出结论,阿仑膦酸钠70毫克每周一次给药方案将为患者提供一种比每日给药更方便、治疗等效的替代方案,并可能提高依从性和治疗的长期持续性。